Gnosis and Modernity – a Postwar German Intellectual Debate on Secularisation, Religion and ‘Overcoming’ the Past

The following paper elaborates on the compound character and the importance of an intellectual discussion regarding Modernity, secularisation and theology that raged within a cluster of German scholars during the 1950s and 1960s (Hans Jonas (1903-93), Hans Blumenberg (1920-96), Gershom Scholem (1897...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hotam, Yotam (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2007
In: Totalitarian movements and political religions
Year: 2007, Volume: 8, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 591-608
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1838552006
003 DE-627
005 20230314101822.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14690760701571213  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838552006 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838552006 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hotam, Yotam  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Gnosis and Modernity – a Postwar German Intellectual Debate on Secularisation, Religion and ‘Overcoming’ the Past 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The following paper elaborates on the compound character and the importance of an intellectual discussion regarding Modernity, secularisation and theology that raged within a cluster of German scholars during the 1950s and 1960s (Hans Jonas (1903-93), Hans Blumenberg (1920-96), Gershom Scholem (1897-1982) and Eric Voegelin (1901-85)). It argues that these scholars were united discursively owing to the appearance of the concept of Gnosis in their postwar debate. Challenging the thesis of Karl Löwith (1897-1973), in which he defined Modernity as secularised Christian theology, they connected Modernity with the Gnostic theology. By innovatively returning to late antiquity and re‐introducing the obscure Gnostic theology, these scholars interwove the intellectual debates of the early twentieth century - in which the concept of Gnosis was redefined - into an acute post‐1945 moral crisis, in order to make a case either for or against Modernity. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Totalitarian movements and political religions  |d London : Taylor & Francis, 2000  |g 8(2007), 3/4, Seite 591-608  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357169360  |w (DE-600)2094283-7  |w (DE-576)273873512  |x 1743-9647  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2007  |g number:3/4  |g pages:591-608 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760701571213  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284632094 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838552006 
LOK |0 005 20230308092103 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL