Illiberalism in Political Islam as Emotion Rather Than Ideology: Moral Discourse on Alcohol and Blasphemy in Turkey

Based on ethnographic interviews with mainstream Islamist voters conducted in Turkey in 2010, this article argues that religion's influence on the form and substance of political opinion can be emotive rather than ideological. Focusing on the moral discourses subjects used to support or oppose...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: King, Judd (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017
In: Politics, religion & ideology
Year: 2017, Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 309-330
Further subjects:B Correction
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1838563318
003 DE-627
005 20230308103437.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21567689.2017.1377615  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838563318 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838563318 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a King, Judd  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Illiberalism in Political Islam as Emotion Rather Than Ideology: Moral Discourse on Alcohol and Blasphemy in Turkey 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Based on ethnographic interviews with mainstream Islamist voters conducted in Turkey in 2010, this article argues that religion's influence on the form and substance of political opinion can be emotive rather than ideological. Focusing on the moral discourses subjects used to support or oppose legal restrictions on two religiously proscribed activities—consuming alcohol and blasphemy—I question the presumption that a religious ‘ideology' rooted in dogmatic adherence to explicit theological principles undergirds the more ‘illiberal' attitudes exhibited by Islamists. Beyond confirming many scholars’ findings that liberal positions can often be grounded in normative Islam, my analysis of these two ‘hot-button' religious issues reveals that the most substantively illiberal opinions are often constructed as logically unconnected to religion—even on irreducibly ‘religious' topics. Particularly, subjects universally constructed the necessity of prohibiting blasphemy as arising not from any divine mandate, but from a variety of nonreligious concerns, including with seemingly malapropos concepts like ‘democracy' and ‘tolerance.' I argue against understandings that limit political Islam’s ideational impact to an ideology people consciously accept or reject, instead favoring a conceptualization that allows religion to exert powerful influence through its complex and highly subjective emotive dimensions. 
601 |a Ideologie 
650 4 |a Correction 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics, religion & ideology  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011  |g 18(2017), 3, Seite 309-330  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)655205705  |w (DE-600)2601917-6  |w (DE-576)343267411  |x 2156-7697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:309-330 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2017.1377615  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284671251 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838563318 
LOK |0 005 20230308103437 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL