Psychological type of American Evangelical missionary candidates
Sending missionaries into the field requires an enormous up-front investment on the part of the candidate as well as the sending organisation. An effective candidate selection process can limit the significant financial and emotional effects of a bad fit for a field placement. The present study seek...
Authors: | ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
In: |
Mental health, religion & culture
Year: 2016, Volume: 19, Issue: 3, Pages: 208-217 |
Further subjects: | B
psychological type
B Myers–Briggs B Missionary B Attrition B American Evangelical B MBTI B candidate assessment |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 183899839X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230313100818.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230313s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13674676.2015.1135420 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)183899839X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP183899839X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dimos, Jonathan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Psychological type of American Evangelical missionary candidates |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Sending missionaries into the field requires an enormous up-front investment on the part of the candidate as well as the sending organisation. An effective candidate selection process can limit the significant financial and emotional effects of a bad fit for a field placement. The present study seeks to analyse the typology of missionary candidates, using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). A sample of 475 American Evangelical missionary candidates took the MBTI as part of their candidacy process. Results indicate that there were significant differences on 12 of the 16 MBTI typologies of the missionary candidates compared to the national representative sample. The ENFJ (14.1%) and ENFP (14.1%) typologies were significantly overrepresented in the sample. The personality types most underrepresented were ISTP (1.1%) and ISFP (1.7%). Comparisons with similar religious populations are discussed. Implications for how missionary candidates may adjust to field work based on type are considered. | ||
601 | |a Psychologie | ||
601 | |a Evangeliar | ||
650 | 4 | |a American Evangelical | |
650 | 4 | |a MBTI | |
650 | 4 | |a Myers–Briggs | |
650 | 4 | |a Attrition | |
650 | 4 | |a candidate assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Missionary | |
650 | 4 | |a psychological type | |
700 | 1 | |a Edwards, Brittany O. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vana, Kristin J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hasz, Monte |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Mental health, religion & culture |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 |g 19(2016), 3, Seite 208-217 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320602273 |w (DE-600)2020319-6 |w (DE-576)096290595 |x 1469-9737 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:208-217 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2015.1135420 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4288595258 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 183899839X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230313100818 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230313||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Myers-Briggs type indicator,Myers-Briggs Typenindikator |