A critique from within: some important research issues that psychologists of religion and spirituality should further work on

Operating from a perspective of an empirical psychologist of religion and spirituality, in this paper, I point to some areas of improvement in our field. Specifically, I (1) briefly target the lack of consensus in defining religion and spirituality; (2) point to the need for answering the crucial qu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abu-Raiya, Hisham (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2017
In: Mental health, religion & culture
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 6, Pages: 544-551
Further subjects:B Critique
B psychology of religion
B Christian bias
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1839000317
003 DE-627
005 20230313101257.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230313s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/13674676.2017.1377945  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1839000317 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1839000317 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Abu-Raiya, Hisham  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Abu-Raiya, Hisham  |a Abu Raiya, Hisham 
245 1 2 |a A critique from within: some important research issues that psychologists of religion and spirituality should further work on 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Operating from a perspective of an empirical psychologist of religion and spirituality, in this paper, I point to some areas of improvement in our field. Specifically, I (1) briefly target the lack of consensus in defining religion and spirituality; (2) point to the need for answering the crucial question: How unique is religion? (3) tackle the Western/Christian bias of the field; and (4) address three fundamental methodological issues (generalisability, self-report, and cross-sectional design) and their implications for research. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Christian bias 
650 4 |a psychology of religion 
650 4 |a Critique 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Mental health, religion & culture  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998  |g 20(2017), 6, Seite 544-551  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320602273  |w (DE-600)2020319-6  |w (DE-576)096290595  |x 1469-9737  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2017  |g number:6  |g pages:544-551 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1377945  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4288597811 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1839000317 
LOK |0 005 20230313101257 
LOK |0 008 230313||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL