Who Says Heaven is Only for Muslims?: Rereading Islamic Resources on the Question of Monopoly on Salvation
The thesis of monopoly of salvation for Muslims is largely based on a (contested) atomistic interpretation of a few verses, prophetic traditions, the political support for an exclusivist understanding, and, as such, needs to be historicized. The thesis needs to be contested on the basis of a critica...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2022
|
| In: |
Studies in interreligious dialogue
Year: 2022, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 175-193 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1839534265 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230319020823.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230318s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/SID.32.2.3291408 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1839534265 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1839534265 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)137887639 |0 (DE-627)696151693 |0 (DE-576)286649772 |4 aut |a Shah, Muhammad Maroof |d 1979- | |
| 109 | |a Shah, Muhammad Maroof 1979- |a Maroof Shah, Muhammad 1979- |a Muhammad Maroof Shah 1979- |a Shah, M. Maroof 1979- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who Says Heaven is Only for Muslims?: Rereading Islamic Resources on the Question of Monopoly on Salvation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The thesis of monopoly of salvation for Muslims is largely based on a (contested) atomistic interpretation of a few verses, prophetic traditions, the political support for an exclusivist understanding, and, as such, needs to be historicized. The thesis needs to be contested on the basis of a critical reception of medieval polemical literature, a further development of theoretical inclusivism in the mainstream theological legacy, a wider diffusion of various shades of inclusivism, and a frank universalism by many influential Muslim scholars. In addition, sophisticated arguments of major Muslim philosophers, Sufis and scholars of the traditionalist school, and a number of independently formulated arguments from many influential modern scholars from other religions and theorists of comparative religion all converge to problematize the exclusivist view. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in interreligious dialogue |d Leuven : Peeters, 1995 |g 32(2022), 2, Seite 175-193 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389126624 |w (DE-600)2148260-3 |w (DE-576)112891241 |x 1783-1806 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:175-193 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/SID.32.2.3291408 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3291408 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 429278034X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1839534265 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230318052520 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230318||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-03-17#57FBFD55B949B6E17ADF85A72ED6C7B726DF9654 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||