The Fragments of Hegesippus and 1Clemenet: Succession Crisis, Heresey and Apostasy
Eusebius, in introducing his Ecclesiastical History, deemed it "an account of the successions of the holy apostles, as well as of the times which have elapsed from the days of our Savior to our own."2 Written circa 325 CE, Ecclesiastical History draws upon the works of Christian historians...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
UtahState University, Merrill-Cazier Library
2017
|
In: |
IMW journal of religious studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 2-24 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Eusebius, in introducing his Ecclesiastical History, deemed it "an account of the successions of the holy apostles, as well as of the times which have elapsed from the days of our Savior to our own."2 Written circa 325 CE, Ecclesiastical History draws upon the works of Christian historians and apologists from the previous three centuries, and represents a veritable "storehouse" of fragments of Christian and pagan authors otherwise non-extant.3 While it is fortunate that the writings of Eusebius have preserved reference to, and quotations from, otherwise lost manuscripts, the unilateral nature of the preservation makes reliable reconstruction of the content and contexts of these works difficult at best, and more often nearly impossible.4 Perhaps no fragments preserved by Eusebius are more paradigmatic of this difficulty than those of the second century Christian apologist Hegesippus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2155-1723 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: IMW journal of religious studies
|