Making Precise Why a Naturalist Should Eschew Emergent Properties

I examine how a naturalist worldview informs work in philosophy of mind with a special focus on the appropriateness of a naturalist adopting emergent properties in his or her ontology. First, I examine two versions of naturalism construed as worldviews and clarify their differences. I argue that one...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moreland, James Porter 1948- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2022
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 171-201
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Philosophy of mind / Emergence / Ontology / Naturalism / Physicalism / Theism / Compatibility
RelBib Classification:VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1843291851
003 DE-627
005 20230621121445.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230420s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/philtheol202344164  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1843291851 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1843291851 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)124556760  |0 (DE-627)363419322  |0 (DE-576)165749229  |4 aut  |a Moreland, James Porter  |d 1948- 
109 |a Moreland, James Porter 1948-  |a Porter Moreland, James 1948-  |a Moreland, J. P. 1948- 
245 1 0 |a Making Precise Why a Naturalist Should Eschew Emergent Properties 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I examine how a naturalist worldview informs work in philosophy of mind with a special focus on the appropriateness of a naturalist adopting emergent properties in his or her ontology. First, I examine two versions of naturalism construed as worldviews and clarify their differences. I argue that one of these versions is what naturalists ought to embrace. Happily, most but not all naturalists recognize this. To defend this claim, I will lay out certain epistemic criteria that are helpful in adjudicating between rival scientific and philosophical paradigms. These criteria will contribute to supporting my preference for which version of naturalism is preferable. Next, I present a general depiction of the components and inner logic of a naturalistic worldview and follow this by providing a precise notion of an emergent property. Finally, I offer several criticisms of emergent properties and conclude that a naturalist ought to avoid them. 
652 |a VA 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4248301-3  |0 (DE-627)104211431  |0 (DE-576)210495235  |2 gnd  |a Philosophy of Mind 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4434297-4  |0 (DE-627)222464194  |0 (DE-576)212405128  |2 gnd  |a Emergenz 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4075660-9  |0 (DE-627)106085344  |0 (DE-576)209198907  |2 gnd  |a Ontologie 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4041365-2  |0 (DE-627)104598654  |0 (DE-576)209044616  |2 gnd  |a Naturalismus 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4174611-9  |0 (DE-627)105370800  |0 (DE-576)209958081  |2 gnd  |a Physikalismus 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 6 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4221530-4  |0 (DE-627)105009326  |0 (DE-576)210273844  |2 gnd  |a Kompatibilität 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophy & theology  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986  |g 34(2022), 1/2, Seite 171-201  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372365930  |w (DE-600)2122985-5  |w (DE-576)443081883  |x 2153-828X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2022  |g number:1/2  |g pages:171-201 
856 4 0 |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=philtheol_2022_0034_0001_0171_0201&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol202344164  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4312154228 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1843291851 
LOK |0 005 20230621121445 
LOK |0 008 230420||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Compatibility,Emergence,Emergent philosophy,Naturalism,Naturalism,Ontology,Ontology,Being,Philosophy of mind,Mind,Spirit,Physicalism,Theism 
STB 0 0 |a Compatibilité,Naturalisme,Naturalisme,Naturalisme (mouvement littéraire),Ontologie,Ontologie,Philosophie de l'esprit,Physicalisme,Théisme,Émergence 
STC 0 0 |a Compatibilidad,Emergencia,Filosofía de la mente,Fisicalismo,Naturalismo,Naturalismo,Ontología,Ontología,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Compatibilità,Emergenza <filosofia>,Emergentismo,Emergentismo,Filosofia della mente,Fisicalismo,Naturalismo,Naturalismo,Ontologia,Ontologia,Teismo 
STE 0 0 |a 存有论,本体论,存在论,心灵哲学,精神哲学,有神论,涌现,呈展,突现,物理主义,形体论,自然主义,自然主义,自然论,自然论 
STF 0 0 |a 心靈哲學,精神哲學,有神論,本体 (信息科学),存有論,本體論,存在論,湧現,呈展,突現,物理主義,形體論,自然主義,自然主義,自然論,自然論 
STG 0 0 |a Compatibilidade,Emergência,Filosofia da mente,Fisicalismo,Naturalismo,Naturalismo,Ontologia,Ontologia,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Натурализм (философия),Натурализм,Онтология (работа со знаниями),Онтология,Совместимость,Теизм,Физикализм,Философия сознания,Эмергенция 
STI 0 0 |a Αναδυτισμός (φιλοσοφία),Θεϊσμός,Νατουραλισμός (φιλοσοφία),Νατουραλισμός,Οντολογία (επεξεργασία γνώσης),Οντολογία,Συμβατότητα,Φιλοσοφία του νου,Φυσικαλισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Mind,Geist,Philosophie des Geistes , Ontology,Ontology,Seinslehre,Seinsphilosophie , Verträglichkeit,Vereinbarkeit