The Modal (Realist) Ontological Argument
This article aims to provide a new ontological argument for the existence of God. A specific "modal" version of the ontological argument - termed the Modal Realist Ontological Argument - is formulated within the modal realist metaphysical framework of David K. Lewis, Kris McDaniel and Phil...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2022
|
In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 203-264 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ontological proof of God's existence
/ Modal logic
/ Realism
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This article aims to provide a new ontological argument for the existence of God. A specific "modal" version of the ontological argument - termed the Modal Realist Ontological Argument - is formulated within the modal realist metaphysical framework of David K. Lewis, Kris McDaniel and Philip Bricker. Formulating this argument within this specific framework will enable the plausibility of its central premise (i.e., the "Possibility Premise") to be established, and allow one to affirm the soundness of the argument - whilst warding off two oft-raised objections against this type of natural theological argument. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-828X |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol2023321155 |