COMMENTARY: Response to the Spiritual Intelligence Debate: Are Some Conceptual Distinctions Needed Here?
The special edition of The International Journal for Psychology of Religion devoted to a discussion of whether or not the concept of "spiritual intelligence" is defensible addressed an issue of assured importance for both the psychology of religion and psychology in general. Much as the ar...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2003
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 2003, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-52 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The special edition of The International Journal for Psychology of Religion devoted to a discussion of whether or not the concept of "spiritual intelligence" is defensible addressed an issue of assured importance for both the psychology of religion and psychology in general. Much as the article by Emmons (2000) and the responses by Gardner (2000), Kwilecki (2000), and Mayer (2000) raised many thought-provoking comments, some questions of central relevance to this issue seemed to be dealt with only marginally in these articles. In this article, I discuss what I consider to be the main examples of such questions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/S15327582IJPR1301_05 |