Death-row organ donation, revisited

In 2011, bioethicists turned their attention to the question of whether prisoners on death row ought to be allowed to be organ donors. The discussion began with a provocative anti-procurement article by Arthur Caplan and prompted responses from an impressive lineup of commentators. In the 10 years s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hansman, Laura (Author) ; Reis-Dennis, Samuel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
In: Bioethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 37, Issue: 6, Pages: 575-580
RelBib Classification:KBQ North America
NCA Ethics
NCH Medical ethics
TK Recent history
Further subjects:B Punishment
B Prisoner
B Organs
B Donation
B Autonomy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1848744471
003 DE-627
005 20230625113436.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230611s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13164  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1848744471 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1848744471 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hansman, Laura  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Death-row organ donation, revisited 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 2011, bioethicists turned their attention to the question of whether prisoners on death row ought to be allowed to be organ donors. The discussion began with a provocative anti-procurement article by Arthur Caplan and prompted responses from an impressive lineup of commentators. In the 10 years since, the situation for death-row inmates seeking to donate has hardly changed: U.S. prison authorities consistently refuse to allow death-row procurement. We believe that it is time to revisit the issue. While Caplan's commentators rebutted his narrow contention that organ procurement would undermine the goals of deterrence and retribution, none of them attempted to make a positive, nonconsequentialist case for organ donation as a right of death-row inmates. That is the task we take up in this paper. After sketching and briefly defending a theory of punishment, we show how denial of organ donation is inconsistent with punishment's basic logic. 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a Prisoner 
650 4 |a Organ 
650 4 |a Donation 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
652 |a KBQ:NCA:NCH:TK 
700 1 |a Reis-Dennis, Samuel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 37(2023), 6, Seite 575-580  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:6  |g pages:575-580 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13164  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13164  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4331281477 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1848744471 
LOK |0 005 20230625113436 
LOK |0 008 230611||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-06-10#67748C6B86145EB8DBEDF5C694642ED65E82C2A5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049227  |a KBQ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Organs,Organ 
STB 0 0 |a Organe,Organe 
STC 0 0 |a Órgano,Órgano 
STD 0 0 |a Organo,Organo 
STF 0 0 |a 器官,機構 
STG 0 0 |a Órgão,Órgão 
STH 0 0 |a Орган (анатомия),Орган (право) 
STI 0 0 |a Όργανο (ανατομία),Όργανο (δίκαιο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Organe,Organe