Force et signification dans l'énoncé eucharistique

Louis Marin (1931-1992), mainly known for his studies on painting, has been also a profound interpreter of the Port-Royal Logic, a work where the effort of modern thinking towards the foundation of an autonomous scientific rationality is testified by its construction of a logic of correct ordering o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fuk, Giacomo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:French
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Morcelliana 2011
In: Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni
Year: 2011, Volume: 77, Issue: 2, Pages: 385-397
Further subjects:B Thought & thinking
B Representation (Philosophy)
B Marin, Louis
B theory of knowledge
B Logic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1850820392
003 DE-627
005 20230622122642.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230622s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c
035 |a (DE-627)1850820392 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1850820392 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a fre 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fuk, Giacomo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Force et signification dans l'énoncé eucharistique 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Louis Marin (1931-1992), mainly known for his studies on painting, has been also a profound interpreter of the Port-Royal Logic, a work where the effort of modern thinking towards the foundation of an autonomous scientific rationality is testified by its construction of a logic of correct ordering of representations inspired by Cartesian philosophy. Nevertheless, the closing of the order of representation - consisting in the correspondence between the representing and the represented which assures the fundamental value of logic, the truth - is not possible, according to Marin, but through a reflection of the representation system on itself, reflection that the system cannot include again in the logical code of truth. In short, the logical distinction true/false (namely the correspondence/ non-correspondence between representing and represented) cannot be applied to itself. Theology then allows and codifies the auto-reflection of the logic system in the shape of the effectiveness (not of the truth) of the act which makes the sign correspond to its meaning: the Eucharistic examples introduced as polemical additions (against Protestants) in the fifth edition (1683), come actually to rule the logic of truth, founding it in a semiotic of effectiveness in which the act of uttering does not mean - but it produces the thing. So the Eucharistic statement does not denote the transubstantiation, but makes it happen. In his last writing on this subject, Marin comes back on his interpretation to show how the force which creates the representation and the meaning does not act in time, but it is time itself. (English) 
601 |a Eucharistie 
650 4 |a Logic 
650 4 |a Marin, Louis 
650 4 |a Representation (Philosophy) 
650 4 |a theory of knowledge 
650 4 |a Thought & thinking 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni  |d Brescia : Morcelliana, 2009  |g 77(2011), 2, Seite 385-397  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1681637510  |w (DE-600)2999637-5  |x 2611-8742  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:77  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:385-397 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4341961799 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1850820392 
LOK |0 005 20230622122321 
LOK |0 008 230622||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u http://www.redi-bw.de/db/ebsco.php/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3d30h%26AN%3d71490496%26site%3dehost-live  |x Verlag  |z Lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Marin, Louis