On the Relationship between Design and Evolution

A longstanding question in science and religion is whether standard evolutionary models are compatible with the claim that the world was designed. In The Compatibility of Evolution and Design, theologian E. V. Rope Kojonen constructs a powerful argument that not only are evolution and design compati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Dilley, Stephen 1974- (VerfasserIn) ; Luskin, Casey (VerfasserIn) ; Miller, Brian (VerfasserIn) ; Reeves, Emily (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: MDPI 2023
In: Religions
Jahr: 2023, Band: 14, Heft: 7
weitere Schlagwörter:B Theology
B laws of nature
B protein evolution
B Science
B evolutionary creation
B Design
B bacterial flagellum
B Fine Tuning
B fitness landscapes
B convergent evolution
B irreducible complexity
B Evolution
B theistic evolution
B Intelligent Design
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1851229701
003 DE-627
005 20230629223111.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230629s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel14070850  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1851229701 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1851229701 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1043765638  |0 (DE-627)770891748  |0 (DE-576)395871573  |4 aut  |a Dilley, Stephen  |d 1974- 
109 |a Dilley, Stephen 1974- 
245 1 0 |a On the Relationship between Design and Evolution 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A longstanding question in science and religion is whether standard evolutionary models are compatible with the claim that the world was designed. In The Compatibility of Evolution and Design, theologian E. V. Rope Kojonen constructs a powerful argument that not only are evolution and design compatible, but that evolutionary processes (and biological data) strongly point to design. Yet Kojonen’s model faces several difficulties, each of which raise hurdles for his understanding of how evolution and design can be harmonized. First, his argument for design (and its compatibility with evolution) relies upon a particular view of nature in which fitness landscapes are “fine-tuned” to allow proteins to evolve from one form to another by mutation and selection. But biological data run contrary to this claim, which poses a problem for Kojonen’s design argument (and, as such, his attempt to harmonize design with evolution). Second, Kojonen appeals to the bacterial flagellum to strengthen his case for design, yet the type of design in the flagellum is incompatible with mainstream evolutionary theory, which (again) damages his reconciliation of design with evolution. Third, Kojonen regards convergent evolution as notable positive evidence in favor of his model (including his version of design), yet convergent evolution actually harms the justification of common ancestry, which Kojonen also accepts. This, too, mars his reconciliation of design and evolution. Finally, Kojonen’s model damages the epistemology that undergirds his own design argument as well as the design intuitions of everyday “theists on the street”, whom he seeks to defend. Thus, despite the remarkable depth, nuance, and erudition of Kojonen’s account, it does not offer a convincing reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘evolution’. 
650 4 |a evolutionary creation 
650 4 |a Fine Tuning 
650 4 |a fitness landscapes 
650 4 |a convergent evolution 
650 4 |a irreducible complexity 
650 4 |a bacterial flagellum 
650 4 |a Theology 
650 4 |a Science 
650 4 |a protein evolution 
650 4 |a laws of nature 
650 4 |a Intelligent Design 
650 4 |a Design 
650 4 |a theistic evolution 
650 4 |a Evolution 
700 1 |a Luskin, Casey  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Miller, Brian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reeves, Emily  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 14(2023), 7, Artikel-ID 850  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2023  |g number:7  |g elocationid:850 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/7/850/pdf?version=1687955767  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070850  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/7/850  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2023  |e 7  |i 850 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4344487168 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1851229701 
LOK |0 005 20230629055509 
LOK |0 008 230629||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-06-28#2EE4FD549BBC22E9FB6FA118F29644AB5C248C9D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Design,Evolution,Evolution,Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory 
STB 0 0 |a Design,Dessein,Dessein,Dessein intelligent,Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Design,Deseño,Deseño,Diseño inteligente,Evolución 
STD 0 0 |a Design,Disegno intelligente,Evoluzione 
STE 0 0 |a 进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 設計,進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Desenho inteligente,Design,Desenho,Desenho,Evolução 
STH 0 0 |a Дизайн,Интеллегентный дизайн,Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Design,Σχεδιασμός,Ντιζάιν,Εξέλιξη,Ευφυής σχεδιασμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh , Formgebung,Eingetragenes Design , Abstammung