The Trolley Dilemma and the Art of Making Judgments on Concrete Situations
Trolley cases are widely used in both ethics research and teaching. We investigate the use of trolleys as ‘cases’ i.e. in guiding reflection on right and wrong in individual and concrete - albeit hypothetical - choice situations (so-called dilemmas). There is something elusive about judging individu...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2022
|
| In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2022, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Pages: 313-334 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
/ Ricœur, Paul 1913-2005
/ Trolley-Problem
/ Dilemma
/ Moral judgment
/ Applied ethics
|
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics TJ Modern history TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1851322884 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230708172426.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230630s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/EP.29.3.3291668 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1851322884 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1851322884 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1212686691 |0 (DE-627)1702692914 |4 aut |a Dubbink, Wim |d 1964- | |
| 109 | |a Dubbink, Wim 1964- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Trolley Dilemma and the Art of Making Judgments on Concrete Situations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Trolley cases are widely used in both ethics research and teaching. We investigate the use of trolleys as ‘cases’ i.e. in guiding reflection on right and wrong in individual and concrete - albeit hypothetical - choice situations (so-called dilemmas). There is something elusive about judging individual cases and we argue that important intricacies are overlooked when trolley cases are used. We claim that reflection on so-called dilemmas using trolley cases is methodologically flawed (in ways worse than the familiar complaint that using trolley cases is ‘abstract’). This flaw also affects the use of trolleys as ‘problems’, i.e. in philosophical research comparing and making sense of the various intuitions people have when reflecting on trolleys as cases. We distinguish ourselves from other critics of ‘trolleyology’ by placing our criticism on using trolleys in the context of a philosophical understanding of the intricacies of judging singular cases. Our philosophical understanding is grounded in the works of Kant and Ricoeur. Following Ricoeur, we demonstrate that proper judgment of concrete cases involves a complex interplay of two different kinds of judgments: a normative judgement and a judgment on the narrative. Proper judgment of cases therefore also critically depends on constituting the case as a narrative. Using trolley cases in this kind of reflection obstructs this possibility and thus affects the art of judgment. In developing our position, we distinguish between casuistic and demonstrative use of cases. We argue that reflection on cases should be casuistic, while trolley cases can only be used demonstratively. | ||
| 652 | |a NCA:TJ:TK:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118559796 |0 (DE-627)133368785 |0 (DE-576)208982949 |2 gnd |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118600613 |0 (DE-627)079392563 |0 (DE-576)162723253 |2 gnd |a Ricœur, Paul |d 1913-2005 |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)123372875X |0 (DE-627)1758124571 |2 gnd |a Trolley-Problem |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4201195-4 |0 (DE-627)105167797 |0 (DE-576)210140364 |2 gnd |a Dilemma |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4074970-8 |0 (DE-627)106087800 |0 (DE-576)209195908 |2 gnd |a Moralisches Urteil |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4307007-3 |0 (DE-627)123213800 |0 (DE-576)211092444 |2 gnd |a Angewandte Ethik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Slegers, Roos |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical perspectives |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994 |g 29(2022), 3, Seite 313-334 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389126381 |w (DE-600)2148229-9 |w (DE-576)112891179 |x 1783-1431 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:313-334 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.29.3.3291668 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3291668&journal_code=EP |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4344903757 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1851322884 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230711110508 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230630||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Applied ethics,Practical ethics,Ethical practice areas,Dilemma,Moral judgment,Ethical judgment |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dilemme,Jugement moral,Éthique appliquée |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dilema,Juicio moral,Ética aplicada |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dilemma,Etica applicata,Giudizio morale |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 应用伦理学,实践伦理学,进退两难窘境,困境,两难情况,道德判断,道德判定 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 應用倫理學,實踐倫理學,進退兩難窘境,困境,兩難情況,道德判斷,道德判定 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Dilema,Juízo moral,Ética aplicada |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Дилемма,Моральное суждение,Прикладная этика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δίλημμα,Εφαρμοσμένη ηθική,Ηθική απόφαση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Kant, Imānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuelʹ,1724-1804,Kant, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuell,1724-1804,Kant, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kantius,1724-1804,Kanto, Imanueru,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūʾīl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿAmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Ḳanṭ, ʿImanuʾel,1724-1804,Kānṭ, ʿAmmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Cant,1724-1804,Kanti, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kants, Imanuels,1724-1804,Kants, Immanuēls,1724-1804,Kantas, I.,1724-1804,Kantas, Imanuelis,1724-1804,Pseudo-Kant,1724-1804,Yi man nu er Kang de,1724-1804,Yimannuer-Kangde,1724-1804,Kangde, Yimannuer,1724-1804,Kang de,1724-1804,Kangde,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Imm.,1724-1804,Kant, Inmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Manuel,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Qanṭ, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kanto,1724-1804,K'ang-tê, I.,1724-1804,K'ang-tê,1724-1804,Kānt,1724-1804,Kānṭ, Imainual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuwil,1724-1804,Kant, Immanual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuell,1724-1804,Kanto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kant, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuele,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuele,1724-1804,Kant, E.,1724-1804,Kant, Manuele,1724-1804,Kant, M.,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Amanuil,1724-1804,K`ant`u,1724-1804,Canto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Im.,1724-1804,Kant, `Imanu'el,1724-1804,Kānt, `Ammānūʹīl,1724-1804,Kant, IImmanuil,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kant, Imainual,1724-1804,K`ang-te,1724-1804,Kan teu,1724-1804 , Ricoeur, Paul,1913-2005,Ricoeur, P.,1913-2005,Rikër, Pol',1913-2005,Lü-ko-erh,1913-2005,Li-k'o, Pao-lo,1913-2005,Ricoeurs, Paul,1913-2005,Ricœr, Paul,1913-2005,ريكور، بول,1913-2005 , Weichenstellerfall , Ethisches Urteil , Praktische Ethik,Applied Ethics,Bereichsethik |