Andrew Loke’s indirect defence of the successive addition argument
In this paper, we consider Andrew Loke’s recent contributions to the successive addition argument. Although he claims to develop the discussion, we conclude that he fails to provide anything that goes beyond the position critiqued by Fellipe Leon. When analysing Loke’s position, we find that his pro...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2023
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 94, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-61 |
| Further subjects: | B
Successive addition
B Time B Kalām |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1852751398 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230716054808.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230715s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-023-09870-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1852751398 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1852751398 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1183848676 |0 (DE-627)1663372403 |4 aut |a Malpass, Alex |d ca. 20./21. Jh. | |
| 109 | |a Malpass, Alex ca. 20./21. Jh. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Andrew Loke’s indirect defence of the successive addition argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, we consider Andrew Loke’s recent contributions to the successive addition argument. Although he claims to develop the discussion, we conclude that he fails to provide anything that goes beyond the position critiqued by Fellipe Leon. When analysing Loke’s position, we find that his proposals either directly collapse back into those critiqued by Leon, or beg the relevant question at hand. We conclude with some speculations about why this sort of mistake may have arisen. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Time | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kalam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Successive addition | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 94(2023), 1, Seite 43-61 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:94 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:43-61 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-023-09870-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4354072904 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1852751398 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230715055508 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230715||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-07-14#3F18FFA41E9DC543CC454EF7F6036425A5D02789 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Kalām |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Kalâm |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Kalam |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Kalām |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯兰教义学,凯拉姆学,伊斯兰神学 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯蘭教義學,凱拉姆學,伊斯蘭神學 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Kalam |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Калам |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Kalām |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Time magazine , Kalām,Ilm al-Kalam,ʿIlm al-Kalām,Kelâm |