Współczesna filozofia prawa wobec fanatyzmu religijnego

The paper presents three strategies that contemporary philosophy of law has developed to respond to emerging challenges currently associated with the religious fanaticism. The first of them - represented by Günther Jakobs - relies on preventive measures against the "enemies" of the constit...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szymaniec, Piotr (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Polish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze 2015
In: Przegla̜d religioznawczy
Year: 2015, Issue: 3/257, Pages: 43-75
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1853367273
003 DE-627
005 20230721164251.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230721s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c
035 |a (DE-627)1853367273 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1853367273 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a pol 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120375499X  |0 (DE-627)1688809732  |4 aut  |a Szymaniec, Piotr 
109 |a Szymaniec, Piotr 
245 1 0 |a Współczesna filozofia prawa wobec fanatyzmu religijnego 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The paper presents three strategies that contemporary philosophy of law has developed to respond to emerging challenges currently associated with the religious fanaticism. The first of them - represented by Günther Jakobs - relies on preventive measures against the "enemies" of the constitutional order, for example against the religiously motivated terrorists. However, the concept of Feindstrafrecht by G. Jakobs is burdened with the arbitrariness in defining the category of "enemies" and undermines the privacy and the principle of ideological neutrality of the state. Ronald Dworkin is a representative of the second strategy. In his last book, Religion without God, Dworkin wants to eliminate the extreme attitudes by reducing the religious freedom to the general right to ethical independence. His approach, however, completely ignores the collective aspect of the religious freedom. Jürgen Habermas proposed a different strategy. His concept, which is the most interesting of the aforementioned in terms of application, on the one hand shows the conditions for the inclusion of religious positions in the area of democratic, rational discourse, and on the other hand it excludes from area of this freedom the religious fanaticisms which do not accept the constitutional consensus of the democratic state. In the author’s opinion, the reflection on the conditions of the limitations on the freedom of religion, which are necessary nowadays, should be complemented by John Stuart Mill’s classical test of harm principle as well as by the use of Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach. These concepts allow us to define in a better manner the situations in which, on the one hand, the actions based on religious beliefs lead - or may lead - to harm of other people and, on the other hand, the religious communities in an unauthorized way restrict the freedom of their own members. Furthermore, the harm principle gives also the opportunity to take some tough decisions in the cases concerning religiously motivated actions of private individuals, e.g. in situations concerning the consent to medical procedures with respect to family members who are not able to make a valid decision. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Przegla̜d religioznawczy  |d Warszawa : Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze, 2004  |g (2015), 3/257, Seite 43-75  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1767752121  |w (DE-600)3091285-4  |x 2658-1531  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2015  |g number:3/257  |g pages:43-75 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ptr.edu.pl/images/Przeglad_Religioznawczy/PR_2015/Przegl%C4%85d_3_2015.pdf  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4356843487 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1853367273 
LOK |0 005 20230721163859 
LOK |0 008 230721||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL