The Use of Philosophy of Science in the Creationism-Evolution Debate: An Ashʿarī Perspective
This article critically reviews how creationists or antievolutionists are using discussions in philosophy of science to undermine the efficacy of evolution to defuse the tension between evolution and religion. They include (1) the scientific realism debate, (2) the distinction between historical and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
2023
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 421-437 |
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
historical science
B Creationism B philosophy of science B demarcation criterion B Induction B scientific realism B Species B Experimental Science |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1854427067 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240221092804.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230806s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2023.2230430 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1854427067 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1854427067 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Malik, Shoaib Ahmed |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Malik, Shoaib Ahmed | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Use of Philosophy of Science in the Creationism-Evolution Debate: An Ashʿarī Perspective |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article critically reviews how creationists or antievolutionists are using discussions in philosophy of science to undermine the efficacy of evolution to defuse the tension between evolution and religion. They include (1) the scientific realism debate, (2) the distinction between historical and experimental sciences, (3) the problem of induction, and (4) the definitional problem of species. It then discusses how using these specific arguments to undermine evolution is misplaced when looked at from an Ashʿarī perspective, a Sunnī school of theology. In doing so, it reveals the multiple ways that theology and philosophy of science are interacting with one another in the ongoing creationism-evolutionism debates. | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Creationism | |
650 | 4 | |a Species | |
650 | 4 | |a demarcation criterion | |
650 | 4 | |a Induction | |
650 | 4 | |a Experimental Science | |
650 | 4 | |a historical science | |
650 | 4 | |a scientific realism | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
652 | |a AB:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 21(2023), 3, Seite 421-437 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372546447 |w (DE-600)2124364-5 |w (DE-576)261325019 |x 1474-6719 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:421-437 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2230430 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 21 |j 2023 |e 3 |h 421-437 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4363336439 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1854427067 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240221092803 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230806||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-08-05#9DA744B71A7C6D5FBF543632C91C55932CB079CD | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |