What Doesn’t Kill Primary Reason Atomism Will Only Make It Stronger: A Limited Defense

Against the reason holists (e.g. Dancy 2014), it has been contended by many reason atomists that while many features might well change their reason statuses or valences in different contexts in the way suggested by reason holists, they are merely secondary rather than primary reasons. In these atomi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsu, Peter Shiu-Hwa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2023
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2023, Volume: 26, Issue: 3, Pages: 431-446
RelBib Classification:NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Reason holism
B Primary reason atomism
B Buck-passing account
B Morally thick
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1858418720
003 DE-627
005 20250327110537.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230831s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-023-10364-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1858418720 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1858418720 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tsu, Peter Shiu-Hwa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What Doesn’t Kill Primary Reason Atomism Will Only Make It Stronger: A Limited Defense 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Against the reason holists (e.g. Dancy 2014), it has been contended by many reason atomists that while many features might well change their reason statuses or valences in different contexts in the way suggested by reason holists, they are merely secondary rather than primary reasons. In these atomists’ scheme of things, there are features that function as primary reasons whose reason statuses remain invariant across contexts. Moreover, these features provide the ultimate source of explanations for why some features, qua secondary reasons, are variable in their reason statuses. Against the background of reason holism, this two-level picture of moral reason has been highly influential as an alternative theory of how moral reasons behave, and has been championed by several eminent philosophers such as Roger Crisp, Brad Hooker, David McNaughton and Piers Rawling. Call this theory ‘primary reason atomism’ (or PRA). Since its advancement, it has been met with lots of challenges, yet most, if not all, of these challenges remain unaddressed, insofar as I could see. This article will pick up the slack, and argues that none of its existing powerful criticisms works that can be derived from Swanton’s target-center view of the virtues, Stangl’s virtue variabilism, Dancy’s bottom-up holism, and coverage challenge, McKeever & Ridge, and Väyrynen’s double-counting objection, and Scanlon’s buck-passing account of values. This may not prove PRA to be right, but at least shows PRA to be a serious contender for the right theory of how moral reason behaves. 
650 4 |a Buck-passing account 
650 4 |a Morally thick 
650 4 |a Primary reason atomism 
650 4 |a Reason holism 
652 |a NCA:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 26(2023), 3, Seite 431-446  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g pages:431-446 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10364-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4371239447 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1858418720 
LOK |0 005 20250327110537 
LOK |0 008 230831||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 939   |a 31-08-23  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL