A Critical Reading of Jean-Luc Marion's Interpretation of Anselm's Ontological Argument
In this essay, I qualify Jean-Luc Marion's anti-ontological interpretation of Anselm's argument. Marion claims that the argument is not ontological but in line with Dionysian apophatic theology. To substantiate his anti-ontological reading, Marion suggests that the main regulative idea of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2023, Volume: 64, Issue: 5, Pages: 637-654 |
RelBib Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1858471923 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230920113517.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230901s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/heyj.14240 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1858471923 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1858471923 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kim, Young Won |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Critical Reading of Jean-Luc Marion's Interpretation of Anselm's Ontological Argument |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this essay, I qualify Jean-Luc Marion's anti-ontological interpretation of Anselm's argument. Marion claims that the argument is not ontological but in line with Dionysian apophatic theology. To substantiate his anti-ontological reading, Marion suggests that the main regulative idea of the Proslogion is bonum. The final regulative idea, however, is gaudium, since gaudium, not bonum, leads the argument to the beatific vision. If we reformulate the Proslogion focusing on gaudium, we find that Marion's analysis misses the evident ontological aspects of the argument, such as the tradition of prayer and hermeneutics. Since Anselm promulgated the argument within the Benedictine tradition of Bec, the practice of prayer or meditation is the legitimate context of the argument. However, because of his emphasis on the structure of call and response over the ontological and hermeneutical aspects of revelation, his analysis neglects the importance of the hermeneutic relation within which the Proslogion is born. | ||
601 | |a Marion, Jean-Luc | ||
601 | |a Interpretation | ||
601 | |a Ontologie | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
652 | |a KAE:KAJ:NBC:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 64(2023), 5, Seite 637-654 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2023 |g number:5 |g pages:637-654 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14240 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.14240 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4371963757 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1858471923 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230920113517 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230901||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-08-31#EF7F948908B420D2821F6E8FB7B14923BE47B10F | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |