Doing What, by Whom, for Whom and How?: An Essay on Interests, Modes, Methods and Other Dynamics in “Theology” and/or “Religious Studies”

The essay begins with a methodological exploration of aspects of the continuing contested relationship between modes of engaging in the study of religion, which are often described in English as “Theology” or “Religious Studies” and more sharply differentiated in the German language as Theologie and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Weller, Paul 1956- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2023
In: Religions
Year: 2023, Volume: 14, Issue: 9
Further subjects:B Theology
B Secular
B epistemologies
B study of religions
B methodologies
B Religious Studies
B Ideologies
B Science of Religion
B Decolonization
B Methods
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1859000223
003 DE-627
005 20230908054805.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230907s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel14091142  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1859000223 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1859000223 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137826087  |0 (DE-627)696095424  |0 (DE-576)305335294  |4 aut  |a Weller, Paul  |d 1956- 
109 |a Weller, Paul 1956-  |a Weller, Paul Gareth 1956- 
245 1 0 |a Doing What, by Whom, for Whom and How?: An Essay on Interests, Modes, Methods and Other Dynamics in “Theology” and/or “Religious Studies” 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The essay begins with a methodological exploration of aspects of the continuing contested relationship between modes of engaging in the study of religion, which are often described in English as “Theology” or “Religious Studies” and more sharply differentiated in the German language as Theologie and Religionswissenschaft. By reference to the example of some of the conflicts that emerged around the formation of the European Academy of Religion, the essay shows how these two modes can solidify into opposing scholarly camps. While acknowledging the economic pragmatics that can come to the fore in institutional settings, it notes that the primacy of “Theology” was rooted in a Christendom social, religious and legal inheritance, while the emergence of Religious Studies and Religionswissenschaft represented an Enlightenment aspiration towards freedom from such. However, the purpose of this essay is neither to take sides between these broad camps, nor to argue that the differences between them are unimportant. Rather, it is centrally concerned with critiquing both modes for having too often proceeded without a sufficiently self-conscious embrace of the contextual impact upon them of social, political and economic frameworks, interests and/or the individual positionalities taken in relation to these. To support its arguments, the essay deploys aspects of the theological and socio-political legacies of the Czech and German theologians Josef Hromádka and Dorothee Soelle, alongside methodological insights and arguments from the British Religious Studies scholars Richard King and Malory Nye. In conclusion, drawing on Ninian Smart’s call for “axioanalysis” in the study of religion, the essay sets out a series of questions to both “Theology” and/or “Religious Studies” which it posits could help to facilitate an important and needed transformation in both “Theology” and “Religious Studies”. Within such a transformation, if socio-political contextuality and positionality are embraced and embedded as necessary (but not exhaustive or exclusive) for both critical and constructive scholarship in “Theology” and “Religious Studies”, then an “engaged” approach to the study of religion might prove able to facilitate a fruitful “shared borderland” between the “hinterland territories” claimed by these otherwise often broadly differential modes of study. 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a Decolonization 
650 4 |a Secular 
650 4 |a Ideologies 
650 4 |a study of religions 
650 4 |a epistemologies 
650 4 |a Methods 
650 4 |a methodologies 
650 4 |a Religionswissenschaft 
650 4 |a Religious Studies 
650 4 |a Theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 14(2023), 9, Artikel-ID 1142  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2023  |g number:9  |g elocationid:1142 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/9/1142/pdf?version=1693992678  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091142  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/9/1142  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4373437947 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1859000223 
LOK |0 005 20230907055506 
LOK |0 008 230907||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-09-06#197C7F3FF52E57E8CE71A118440867E0FFD987AD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions 
STB 0 0 |a Science des religions 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias de la religión 
STD 0 0 |a Scienze religiose 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教学 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教學 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências da religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религиоведение 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκειολογία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung