Is There a Suspension of Subjectivity?
This article examines the Kierkegaard reception of the Danish theologians K. Olesen Larsen and Johannes Sløk, who both understood Kierkegaard as attempting to radically subvert the freedom of the human being. Initially, I show how current Kierkegaard research on the question of subjectivity, freedom...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Year: 2023, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 99-113 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1865765457 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231023195839.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231016s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/kierke-2023-0006 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1865765457 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1865765457 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brorson, Mikael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is There a Suspension of Subjectivity? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines the Kierkegaard reception of the Danish theologians K. Olesen Larsen and Johannes Sløk, who both understood Kierkegaard as attempting to radically subvert the freedom of the human being. Initially, I show how current Kierkegaard research on the question of subjectivity, freedom and indirect communication differs from the readings of Olesen Larsen and Sløk. Subsequently, and in contrast to this, Olesen Larsen's somewhat ambivalent attempt to read Kierkegaard as undermining human freedom is presented. Third, I show how Sløk arrives at a somewhat similar result, though in a more coherent way. In conclusion, the article offers a brief discussion on the plausibility of this interpretation. | ||
| 601 | |a Suspension | ||
| 652 | |a KAH:KAJ:NBE:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996 |g 28(2023), 1, Seite 99-113 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)369083393 |w (DE-600)2118444-6 |w (DE-576)107015773 |x 1612-9792 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:99-113 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2023-0006 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2023-0006/html |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2023 |e 1 |h 99-113 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4389819119 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1865765457 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231024141956 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||