Kierkegaard and "Religionswissenschaft", (Part 2): A Source- and Reception-Historical Survey
This second part of a two-part article (the first part of which appeared in the Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 2022) surveys the varying uses made of Kierkegaard's writings by four twentieth- and, in two of their cases, also twenty-first-century contributors to Religionswissenschaft: Joachim Wach...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2023, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 377-410 |
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism TJ Modern history TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This second part of a two-part article (the first part of which appeared in the Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 2022) surveys the varying uses made of Kierkegaard's writings by four twentieth- and, in two of their cases, also twenty-first-century contributors to Religionswissenschaft: Joachim Wach, Mircea Eliade, Wendy Doniger, and Bruce Lincoln, all four of whom happen to have taught at the University of Chicago Divinity School. Far from being irrelevant or being regarded as a theologically-inclined persona non grata by comparatists of religion, Kierkegaard was embraced in three main capacities by these influential contributors to the field: as a datum (mostly in the history of theology and/or philosophy), as a theorist, and, in one case, as an existential soulmate. In Lincoln's case, the reduction to memes - the memeification - of certain ideas ascribed to Kierkegaard comes under consideration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2023-0017 |