Polemical Paths: Tsongkhapa and Taktsang on Yogic Perception

Tibetan Buddhist polemics are often perceived as a type of hairsplitting or logic chopping, where defeating one’s opponent is more highly prized than arriving at truth. This assumes that Tibetan polemicists are obsessed with inconsequential minutiae and invested in nitpicking, trite attempts at self...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:"Tibetan Polemics as Genre"
Main Author: Forman, Jed (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Chicago Press 2023
In: The journal of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 103, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-26
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 186597014X
003 DE-627
005 20231018114921.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1086/722542  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)186597014X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP186597014X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)128969706X  |0 (DE-627)1845644751  |4 aut  |a Forman, Jed 
109 |a Forman, Jed 
245 1 0 |a Polemical Paths: Tsongkhapa and Taktsang on Yogic Perception 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a "Tibetan Polemics as Genre" 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Tibetan Buddhist polemics are often perceived as a type of hairsplitting or logic chopping, where defeating one’s opponent is more highly prized than arriving at truth. This assumes that Tibetan polemicists are obsessed with inconsequential minutiae and invested in nitpicking, trite attempts at self-aggrandizement. This article seeks to undermine the notion of Tibetan polemics as mere quibbling, arguing that what appears to be competitive carping in fact involves high stakes. Each Tibetan Buddhist philosophical system is constituted by tightly imbricated tenets, which not only are deeply interconnected with each other but individually comprise a microcosm of that system’s broader philosophical view. Inconsistencies between two systems’ seemingly subsidiary tenets thus demarcate proxy battles indicating larger conflicts over each system’s total cogency. To explore this point, I investigate one "polemic" initiated by Taktsang Lotsāwa (1405-77) against the Gelug school concerning yogic perception and where it occurs along the adherent’s spiritual progression. Although this point seems trivial at first blush, a deeper analysis reveals that it is central to Taktsang’s entire philosophy. Taktsang is invoking a wider philosophical framework in which reality transcends appearances. Impermanence entails appearances, and so cannot be an object of yogic perception, which necessarily perceives reality. Tsongkhapa, on the other hand, argues that reality remains accessible to appearances, and so yogic perception can realize impermanence. In this small debate, much larger stakes become clear—the very connection between appearances and reality, a cornerstone issue of both ontology and epistemology. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of religion  |d Chicago, Ill. : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 103(2023), 1, Seite 5-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)329085689  |w (DE-600)2047675-9  |w (DE-576)113710593  |x 1549-6538  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:103  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:5-26 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1086/722542  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4391231549 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 186597014X 
LOK |0 005 20231017145358 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL