In defence of Mary's consent: a response to Hereth
In this article I defend the possibility of the Virgin Mary's free consent to bear the Son of God at the Annunciation against Blake Hereth's argument that God's offer cannot but be either coercive or deceptive, or both. I argue that the Immaculate Conception does help ensure this poss...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2023, Volume: 59, Numéro: 4, Pages: 801-816 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Immaculate Conception
B Consent B Virgin Mary |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | In this article I defend the possibility of the Virgin Mary's free consent to bear the Son of God at the Annunciation against Blake Hereth's argument that God's offer cannot but be either coercive or deceptive, or both. I argue that the Immaculate Conception does help ensure this possibility, contrary to what Hereth also argues against me. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003441252200052X |