‘There can be only one’: A response to Joseph C. Schmid
Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God's unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid's concerns. I defen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 59, Issue: 4, Pages: 836-851 |
| Further subjects: | B
Joseph C. Schmid
B Philosophy of religion B Naturalism B Classical Theism B gap problem |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1869734165 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231108163423.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231108s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412522000713 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1869734165 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1869734165 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1156543134 |0 (DE-627)1019346582 |0 (DE-576)502238607 |4 aut |a Fernández Gel, Enric | |
| 109 | |a Fernández Gel, Enric |a Gel, Enric Fernández |a Fernández-Gel, Enric | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘There can be only one’ |b A response to Joseph C. Schmid |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God's unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid's concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Joseph C. Schmid | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Classical Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gap problem | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of religion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 59(2023), 4, Seite 836-851 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:836-851 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |7 0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/there-can-be-only-one-a-response-to-joseph-c-schmid/F05CFC25EB594A750B15C61BF6DE3281 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |7 0 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4404252463 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1869734165 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231108163014 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 08-11-23 |b l01 | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
