Contested Sacredness: The Struggle for Bears Ears

Southern Utah and the Four Corners region is home to five Tribal nations, united by shared experiences of settler colonialism and a tie to the landscapes of Bears Ears National Monument. After years of Tribal advocacy to protect the site, President Obama designated the monument under the Antiquities...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keegan, Brennan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2022
In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 90, Issue: 4, Pages: 836-859
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1870633326
003 DE-627
005 20231120090848.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231120s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfad033  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1870633326 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1870633326 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Keegan, Brennan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Contested Sacredness  |b The Struggle for Bears Ears 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Southern Utah and the Four Corners region is home to five Tribal nations, united by shared experiences of settler colonialism and a tie to the landscapes of Bears Ears National Monument. After years of Tribal advocacy to protect the site, President Obama designated the monument under the Antiquities Act in December 2016. A year later, President Trump reduced the 1.35-million-acre national monument by 85 percent to make way for uranium mining, officially sanctifying state control and natural resource extraction. Protests and lawsuits ensued. The legal status of Bears Ears continues to be contested. Religious freedom, capitalism, nationalism, environmental protection, and tourism have coalesced at the site in an example of the production, shift, and conflict of spatial relations. By mapping the constellation of spaces produced by the stakeholders, this article argues that a spatial lens points to moments of overlap and resolution as the case moves forward. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Academy of Religion  |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967  |g 90(2022), 4, Seite 836-859  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)338767819  |w (DE-600)2064642-2  |w (DE-576)10686971X  |x 1477-4585  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:90  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g pages:836-859 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfad033  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4413899156 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1870633326 
LOK |0 005 20231120090848 
LOK |0 008 231120||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL