Pittard on Religious Disagreement
This paper focuses on Pittard’s path to rationalism. It begins from the master argument Pittard identifies against rational disagreement among epistemic peers. It raises an issue for Pittard’s endorsement of the first premise of that argument, but focuses primarily on the third premise. It suggests...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2023
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2023, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 311-324 |
| Further subjects: | B
Rationalism
B permissivism B Reflection B partisan justification B Reliability |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1871129990 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231126000846.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231125s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10044 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1871129990 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1871129990 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1027500641 |0 (DE-627)729226743 |0 (DE-576)373278462 |4 aut |a Kvanvig, Jonathan L. |d 1954- | |
| 109 | |a Kvanvig, Jonathan L. 1954- |a Kvanvig, Jonathan 1954- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pittard on Religious Disagreement |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper focuses on Pittard’s path to rationalism. It begins from the master argument Pittard identifies against rational disagreement among epistemic peers. It raises an issue for Pittard’s endorsement of the first premise of that argument, but focuses primarily on the third premise. It suggests a way of denying the third premise beyond the possibilities Pittard identifies, and then questions the strategy Pittard uses for ruling out competitors to his rationalism for defending the possibility of partisan justification in cases of peer disagreement. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a partisan justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reliability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a permissivism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reflection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rationalism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 13(2023), 4, Seite 311-324 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:311-324 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10044 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/13/4/article-p311_004.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 441755904X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1871129990 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231125055504 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-11-24#33D6B3450E74568667EDB6225E955983459CCDA7 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||