Who We Are and Where We Came from: Divergent Views on Human Origins
In this article, I respond to Malik’s analysis of positions on common descent (“Creationism, Human exceptionalism, Adamic exceptionalism, and No exceptions”), regarding their metaphysical and hermeneutic compatibility with al-Ghazali’s approach. As a “no exceptions” proponent, I offer a number of Je...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
2023
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 4, Pages: 588-598 |
Review of: | Islam and evolution (London : Routledge, 2021) (Pear, Rachel S. A.)
|
RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam NBD Doctrine of Creation NBE Anthropology TJ Modern history TK Recent history |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
B Sacks B divine image B Soloveitchik B Judaism B Humanity B Evolution B Heschel |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | In this article, I respond to Malik’s analysis of positions on common descent (“Creationism, Human exceptionalism, Adamic exceptionalism, and No exceptions”), regarding their metaphysical and hermeneutic compatibility with al-Ghazali’s approach. As a “no exceptions” proponent, I offer a number of Jewish theological sources that support this position, and argue with Malik’s assessment of this stance as scientistic. Due to my divergence from Malik on this fundamental issue, I then go on in the article to explore possible conceptualizations of disagreement, dialogue and the interaction of diverse views regarding fundamental matters. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Defending ‘Islam and Evolution: Al-Ghazālī and the Modern Evolutionary Paradigm': Abrahamic Dialogues and Interdisciplinary Insights (2023)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2023.2255946 |