Religious faith and social justice: on Hägglund’s incompatibility thesis

Is religious faith necessarily a barrier to the achievement of a just society? In This Life, Martin Hägglund answers ‘yes’, defending a form of political atheism based on the claim that a wholehearted commitment to social justice presupposes the recognition of humans as altogether finite, mortal bei...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Birnbaum, Simon (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2023
In: Politics, religion & ideology
Year: 2023, Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 586-607
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1877329185
003 DE-627
005 20240105055508.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240105s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21567689.2023.2287582  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1877329185 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1877329185 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Birnbaum, Simon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious faith and social justice: on Hägglund’s incompatibility thesis 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Is religious faith necessarily a barrier to the achievement of a just society? In This Life, Martin Hägglund answers ‘yes’, defending a form of political atheism based on the claim that a wholehearted commitment to social justice presupposes the recognition of humans as altogether finite, mortal beings. Hägglund’s thorough contribution offers a useful entry point for exploring widely perceived—but seldom articulated—obstacles to more conciliatory approaches for seeking radical social change. In this article I unpack and reject what I call Hägglund’s incompatibility thesis on religious faith and social justice. I argue that it ultimately rests on false oppositions that present no insurmountable obstacles to firm coalitions for social activism across secular and religious worldviews. While Hägglund’s arguments raise relevant questions and challenges for some theological views, his global rejection of theistic faith from coalitions for social justice turns out to be (1) unnecessary, (2) illiberal, and (3) counterproductive. Considering the possibilities and hindrances for stable alliances for liberal equality across groups, I contend that political philosophy and social justice activism cannot afford to cut off or alienate theistic believers from egalitarian political struggles. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics, religion & ideology  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011  |g 24(2023), 4, Seite 586-607  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)655205705  |w (DE-600)2601917-6  |w (DE-576)343267411  |x 2156-7697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:586-607 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21567689.2023.2287582?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2023.2287582  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2023  |e 4  |h 586-607 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 444923426X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1877329185 
LOK |0 005 20240105055508 
LOK |0 008 240105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-01-04#F4844F19759D7C41BAFFB159260C745F26BA6E7B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL