Why we do not need demonstrative proof for God's existence to know that God exists: Robert Nozick's case for the existence of God
As a counterpoint to demonstrative proofs in metaphysics, Robert Nozick presented the case for God's existence based on the value of personal experiences. Personal experiences shape one's life, but this is even more evident with extraordinary experiences, such can be religious ones. In the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
| In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2023, Volume: 65, Issue: 4, Pages: 464-486 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Nozick, Robert 1938-2002
/ Experience
/ Existence
/ Epistemologische Überzeugung
/ Proof of God's existence
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
außergewöhnliche Erfahrung
B nicht-demonstratives Argument B Faith B Robert Nozick B God B Extraordinary Experiences B non-demonstrative arguments |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |