From representation to power: the Bilderverbot reconsidered
When considered in the field of aesthetics, the Bilderverbot (biblical ban on pictures) is received with a variety of attitudes ranging between the extremes of Kant’s praise and Hegel’s criticism. Despite being at odds with each other, Kant’s and Hegel’s interpretations suffer from the same theoreti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 84, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 275-293 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Image prohibition
/ Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
/ Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Representation
/ God
/ Power
|
RelBib Classification: | HB Old Testament KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Nietzsche
B Picture B Hegel B Idolatry B Power B Kant |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1879371545 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240710104527.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240127s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2024.2302835 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1879371545 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1879371545 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fortis, Beniamino |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a From representation to power: the Bilderverbot reconsidered |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a When considered in the field of aesthetics, the Bilderverbot (biblical ban on pictures) is received with a variety of attitudes ranging between the extremes of Kant’s praise and Hegel’s criticism. Despite being at odds with each other, Kant’s and Hegel’s interpretations suffer from the same theoretical flaw: both assume that the pictures the Bible talks about are representations related to their objects by way of reference. This assumption is proven wrong in the pars destruens of this essay, in which it will be argued that using the notion of ‘representation’ as a key to the reading of the Bilderverbot is a misconception that leads to an anachronistic and partial view of the matter. The concept of ‘gaze,’ elaborated by Régis Debray and other scholars of visual studies, is introduced in the pars construens of this essay to show that the biblical prohibition is actually aimed at a different kind of pictures, to wit at presentifications, which, instead of referring to their objects in a representational way, are rather thought to embody and dominate them. In conclusion, through Nietzsche’s insights into the reasons behind religious cults, the point is finally made that the notion of ‘power’ surpasses that of ‘representation’ in capturing and accounting for the authentic meaning of the Bilderverbot. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Power | |
650 | 4 | |a Idolatry | |
650 | 4 | |a Picture | |
650 | 4 | |a Nietzsche | |
650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
652 | |a HB:KAH:NBC:VA:VB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4139569-4 |0 (DE-627)10454032X |0 (DE-576)209695439 |a Bilderverbot |2 gnd |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118559796 |0 (DE-627)133368785 |0 (DE-576)208982949 |2 gnd |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118547739 |0 (DE-627)133763331 |0 (DE-576)208952438 |2 gnd |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich |d 1770-1831 |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118587943 |0 (DE-627)133733971 |0 (DE-576)209049553 |2 gnd |a Nietzsche, Friedrich |d 1844-1900 |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4137492-7 |0 (DE-627)105649619 |0 (DE-576)209678070 |2 gnd |a Repräsentation |
689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
689 | 0 | 6 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4036824-5 |0 (DE-627)104637269 |0 (DE-576)209020679 |2 gnd |a Macht |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 84(2023), 3/4, Seite 275-293 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)731333985 |w (DE-600)2692945-4 |w (DE-576)381266621 |x 2169-2335 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:84 |g year:2023 |g number:3/4 |g pages:275-293 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2024.2302835 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a NOMM | ||
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
BIR | |a 29020004_29020006,32005008_32005010 |b biblesearch | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 446870036X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1879371545 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240715120146 | ||
LOK | |0 008 240127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-01-26#D99BF83B54ED33059EA2F3D59ECD63C0C9524660 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044128 |a HB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a God,God,Image prohibition,Prohibition of images,Ban on images,Exodus,Deuteronomium,Power,Power,Political power,Social power,Social influence,Representation,Representation,Representation,Representation,Political representation,Representational political system,Popular representation |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dieu,Dieu,Pouvoir,Pouvoir,Puissance,Puissance,Puissance (motif),Puissance,Représentation,Représentation,Représentation,Représentation |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dios,Dios,Poder,Poder,Representación,Representación,Representación,Representación |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dio,Dio,Potere,Potere,Rappresentanza,Rappresentazione,Rappresentazione,Rappresentanza |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 代表,代表,代理,代理,权力,权力,权,权,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 代表,代表,代理,代理,權力,權力,權,權,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Deus,Deus,Poder,Poder,Representação,Representação,Representação,Representação |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Власть (мотив),Власть,Репрезентация (политика),Репрезентация (социология),Репрезентация (философия),Репрезентация |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αντιπροσώπευση (πολιτική),Εκπροσώπηση (κοινωνιολογία),Αντιπροσώπευση (φιλοσοφία),Αντιπροσώπευση,Εξουσία <μοτίβο>,Εξουσία,Δύναμη,Δύναμη (μοτίβο),Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός |
SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Bibel,Exodus,20,4-6,Bibel,Deuteronomium,5,8-10,Zweites Gebot,Erstes Gebot , Kant, Imānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuelʹ,1724-1804,Kant, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuell,1724-1804,Kant, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kantius,1724-1804,Kanto, Imanueru,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūʾīl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿAmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Ḳanṭ, ʿImanuʾel,1724-1804,Kānṭ, ʿAmmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Cant,1724-1804,Kanti, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kants, Imanuels,1724-1804,Kants, Immanuēls,1724-1804,Kantas, I.,1724-1804,Kantas, Imanuelis,1724-1804,Pseudo-Kant,1724-1804,Yi man nu er Kang de,1724-1804,Yimannuer-Kangde,1724-1804,Kangde, Yimannuer,1724-1804,Kang de,1724-1804,Kangde,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Imm.,1724-1804,Kant, Inmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Manuel,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Qanṭ, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kanto,1724-1804,K'ang-tê, I.,1724-1804,K'ang-tê,1724-1804,Kānt,1724-1804,Kānṭ, Imainual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuwil,1724-1804,Kant, Immanual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuell,1724-1804,Kanto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kant, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuele,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuele,1724-1804,Kant, E.,1724-1804,Kant, Manuele,1724-1804,Kant, M.,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Amanuil,1724-1804,K`ant`u,1724-1804,Canto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Im.,1724-1804,Kant, `Imanu'el,1724-1804,Kānt, `Ammānūʹīl,1724-1804,Kant, IImmanuil,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kant, Imainual,1724-1804,K`ang-te,1724-1804,Kan teu,1724-1804 , Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friederich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg W.,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Vilhelm-Fridrix,1770-1831,Hegel, G. V. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, G.,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich Georg,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm,1770-1831,Hegel, G. F. W.,1770-1831,Hegel, G. Fr. W.,1770-1831,Hegel, György Vilmos Frigyes,1770-1831,Hegel, Jorge Guillermo Federico,1770-1831,Hegel, Giorgio G. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Giorgio,1770-1831,Hegel, Geʾorg Ṿilhelm Fridrikh,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Wilhelmus Fridericus,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Wilhelmus,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius Guilelmus Fridericus,1770-1831,Hegel, P'ŭridŭrihi,1770-1831,Hegel,1770-1831,Chegel, G. V. Fr.,1770-1831,Chenkel,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, G. V. F.,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Fridrich,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Georg Vilʹgelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831,Gegelj, Georg Vilʹgelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hegeli, Georg Vilhelm Pʹridrix,1770-1831,Hėgelis, Georgas,1770-1831,Heġel', Ġeorġ Vil'hel'm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hēgeru, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Hēgeru,1770-1831,Hegelos,1770-1831,Egelos,1770-1831,Higil,1770-1831,Ḥīǧal,1770-1831,Hīġil, Ġiyūrġ Filhilm Fridrīš,1770-1831,Hīġil,1770-1831,Hīǧil,1770-1831,Hei ge er,1770-1831,Heigeer,1770-1831,Hēgeru,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg,1770-1831,Hegel, G. W. Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Hegel, Friedrich,1770-1831,Hegel, Georg Vilhelm Fridrih,1770-1831,Hegel, Georgius W.,1770-1831,Chegel,1770-1831,Chegel, Georg Vilchelm Fridrich,1770-1831,Chenkel, Gkeornk,1770-1831,Heige'er,1770-1831,Hegel, P'µuridµurihi,1770-1831,Gegel', G. V. F.,1770-1831,Gegel', Georg Vil'gel'm Fridrich,1770-1831,Hγegelis, Georgas,1770-1831,Hegel, Wilhelm F.,1770-1831,Higil, G. W. F.,1770-1831,Gegelʹ, Georg Vilʹgelm,1770-1831,Hegel, Federico Guillermo,1770-1831,Hegel, Geoleukeu Bilhelleum Peulideulihi,1770-1831,He gel, Ge o leu keu Bil hel leum Peu li deu li hi,1770-1831,Hehelʹ, Heorh Vilʹhelʹm Fridrich,1770-1831 , Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Friedrich W.,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Friedrich G.,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Federico G.,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Frederico,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Fridericus,1844-1900,Nietzsche,1844-1900,Nīča, Fridirīk,1844-1900,Nīča, Frīdrīš,1844-1900,Nīča, Frīdrīš Wīlhilm,1844-1900,Niče, Fridrih,1844-1900,Niče, Fridrich,1844-1900,Nich'e, P'ŭridŭrihi,1844-1900,Nic'še, Fridrix,1844-1900,Nicšė, Frydrych,1844-1900,Nicše, Friedrich,1844-1900,Nicše, F.,1844-1900,Nicše, Fridrich,1844-1900,Nicše,1844-1900,Nītša, Frīdrīš,1844-1900,Nietszche, Friedrich,1844-1900,Nietztsche,1844-1900,Niezsche, F.,1844-1900,Nitče,1844-1900,Niṭsheh, Fridrikh,1844-1900,Nitse, Phreideriku,1844-1900,Nitse, Phrēntrich,1844-1900,Nitse, Phrintrich,1844-1900,Nitse, Phr.,1844-1900,Nitse,1844-1900,Nitše, F.,1844-1900,Nītših, Frīdrīk,1844-1900,Nītših, Frīdriš,1844-1900,Niṭshah, Fridrikh,1844-1900,Nyčė, Frydrichas,1844-1900,N., Fridericus,1844-1900,Nīče, Frīdrihs Vilhelms,1844-1900,Nīče, Fridrihs,1844-1900,Nīče, Frīdrihs,1844-1900,Nīče, Vilhelms,1844-1900,Nīche, F. W.,1844-1900,Nīche, F.,1844-1900,Nīche, Furīdorihi,1844-1900,Nīche,1844-1900,Nītše, Frīdriš,1844-1900,Fu li de li xi Ni cai,1844-1900,Fulidelixi-Nicai,1844-1900,Nicai, Fulidlixi,1844-1900,Ni cai,1844-1900,Nicai,1844-1900,Nitsi,1844-1900,Netzi, Fidirix Wilihlim,1844-1900,Nitče, Fredrix,1844-1900,Nitche, Fredih,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Federico,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Frédéric,1844-1900,Nietzsche, Fryderyk,1844-1900,Nitcše, Fridrich,1844-1900,Nīche, Furīdorihhi Viruherumu,1844-1900,Nicšė, Frydrych,1844-1900,Peu li deu li hi Ni che,1844-1900,Peulideulihi-Niche,1844-1900,Niche, Peulideulihi,1844-1900,Nich'e, P'ŭridŭrihi,1844-1900,Nic̕še, P̕ridrix,1844-1900 , Politische Repräsentation,Repräsentativsystem,Repräsentationssystem,Volksrepräsentation,Repräsentativverfassung,Soziale Repräsentation,Kollektive Repräsentation , Playing God , Politische Macht,Soziale Macht,Sozialer Einfluss |