Beyond the Polemics: Freedom and Necessity in Plotinus and St Maximus Confessor

The aim of this paper is to challenge the prevailing polemic between ‘necessary’ emanation and ‘free’ creation. I begin by arguing for the presence of freedom and volition in the emanationism of Plotinus. I then move on to explore the role of necessity in the creationism of Maximus. In both cases, I...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heide, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2024
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 65, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-63
RelBib Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
NBD Doctrine of Creation
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1879611953
003 DE-627
005 20240716095619.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240131s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/heyj.14276  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1879611953 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1879611953 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Heide, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Beyond the Polemics: Freedom and Necessity in Plotinus and St Maximus Confessor 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this paper is to challenge the prevailing polemic between ‘necessary’ emanation and ‘free’ creation. I begin by arguing for the presence of freedom and volition in the emanationism of Plotinus. I then move on to explore the role of necessity in the creationism of Maximus. In both cases, I rely upon a twofold schematisation of freedom and necessity to dissolve the dichotomy between them effectively. Having levelled the playing field, so to speak, I conclude that, all things being equal, one does find in Maximus (and Christian thinkers generally) a heightened sense of divine volition and relationality beyond that of the pagan Neoplatonists. This greater emphasis upon the freedom of the divine will, however, has little bearing on whether Maximus's doctrine of creation is ‘emanationist’ or ‘creationist’. Instead, it stems from a biblically inspired sense of the One God as intimately involved in His creation which, though derived from God, is crucially other than God. 
601 |a Plotinus 
652 |a KAB:NBD:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 65(2024), 1, Seite 49-63  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:49-63 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/heyj.14276  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14276  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.14276  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4472574721 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1879611953 
LOK |0 005 20240301150108 
LOK |0 008 240131||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-01-30#AE7639C29DEAACAAD21D8B42A57A29BE0C7AF992 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044284  |a KAB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051531  |a NBD 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL