Hegel’s Criticism of Pyrrhonism
This paper presents Hegel’s criticism of two central ideas of Pyrrhonism: the importance of stating only how things appear and Pyrrhonism as a way of life. After providing a sketch of the main features of Pyrrhonism, the paper lays out and critically evaluates Hegel’s largely unexamined argument aga...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2024
|
In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2024, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-27 |
Further subjects: | B
Hegel
B Pyrrhonism B suspension of judgment B Skepticism B Appearance B Contradiction |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1882167155 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240229055506.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240229s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10073 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1882167155 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1882167155 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Spigt, Joris |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Hegel’s Criticism of Pyrrhonism |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper presents Hegel’s criticism of two central ideas of Pyrrhonism: the importance of stating only how things appear and Pyrrhonism as a way of life. After providing a sketch of the main features of Pyrrhonism, the paper lays out and critically evaluates Hegel’s largely unexamined argument against Pyrrhonism in his early 1802 essay on skepticism. Hegel claims that the Pyrrhonist’s appeal to appearance renders Pyrrhonism philosophically vacuous: insofar as Pyrrhonism merely describes the subjective contents of the Pyrrhonist’s mind, it has no philosophical import. Sextus would not accept Hegel’s criticism because the appeal to appearance could express the provisional rather than purely subjective character of Pyrrhonism. The paper proceeds by examining Hegel’s argument in the Phenomenology that skepticism is contradictory on account of conjoining suspension of judgment with acquiescing in appearances as the guide to life. Sextus would reject Hegel’s criticism by insisting on the distinction between judgment and appearance. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Contradiction | |
650 | 4 | |a Appearance | |
650 | 4 | |a suspension of judgment | |
650 | 4 | |a Pyrrhonism | |
650 | 4 | |a Skepticism | |
650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 14(2024), 1, Seite 1-27 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:1-27 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10073 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/14/1/article-p1_001.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a NOMM | ||
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4493997346 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1882167155 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240229055506 | ||
LOK | |0 008 240229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-02-28#24EDD84FD41C4744ADB8DC533FC1D92638C2E4B8 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |