Response to Sam Gill's Article "What is Mother Earth?: a name, a Meme, a Conspiracy

The author points out that Gill is clearly focused on disproving the historical existence of widespread ideas of a Mother Earth, and of the name Mother Earth and argues that this does not mean that the proper name Mother Earth is completely missing in ethnographic reports prior to Albrecht Dietrich&...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Nebentitel:"Special Issue Forum: On Mother Earth"
1. VerfasserIn: Sundström, Olle 1968- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Equinox Publ. 2024
In: Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture
Jahr: 2024, Band: 18, Heft: 2, Seiten: 230-236
weitere Schlagwörter:B Indigenous religions
B Sami religion
B Mother Earth
B Indigenous Religions
B Comparison
B Nenets religion
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The author points out that Gill is clearly focused on disproving the historical existence of widespread ideas of a Mother Earth, and of the name Mother Earth and argues that this does not mean that the proper name Mother Earth is completely missing in ethnographic reports prior to Albrecht Dietrich's Mutter Erdeand the Romanticists of the nineteenth century. The article explores two examples from ethnographies about the Sami people where terms that could reasonably be translated as "Mother Earth" are quite independent of a romantic image of "primitive" people.
ISSN:1749-4915
Bezug:Kritik von "What is Mother Earth? (2024)"
Kritik in "Comments on Responses to "What is Mother Earth?" (2024)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/jsrnc.24264