Who owns religion? Scholars, Sikhs and the public sphere
This paper revisits the question “Who Owns Religion?”, in the context of a recent analysis of debates in religious studies, marked by controversy and friction between members of religious traditions and scholars writing about those traditions. Habermas’s concept of a public sphere is at the center o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2024
|
| In: |
Religion
Year: 2024, Volume: 54, Issue: 2, Pages: 297–319 |
| Further subjects: | B
Public Sphere
B Sikhs B Religious Studies B Habermas B History B Identity B Universities |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1885439598 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240411002349.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240410s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2289404 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1885439598 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1885439598 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)170075818 |0 (DE-627)060099615 |0 (DE-576)185804403 |4 aut |a Singh, Nirvikar | |
| 109 | |a Singh, Nirvikar |a Singh, Nirvikar K. |a Singh, N. K. |a Singh, N. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who owns religion? Scholars, Sikhs and the public sphere |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper revisits the question “Who Owns Religion?”, in the context of a recent analysis of debates in religious studies, marked by controversy and friction between members of religious traditions and scholars writing about those traditions. Habermas’s concept of a public sphere is at the center of an analysis by Laurie Patton that uses six case studies, including one involving the Sikh tradition. The paper reviews this conceptual framing and the accompanying analysis, provides a reconsideration of the Sikh case, which pertains to the construction of religious boundaries in that tradition, and draws more general lessons, including the functioning of academia as well as the contextual appropriateness of the concept of the public sphere. It argues that “eruptions” in the public sphere can be reduced by improvements in academic knowledge production, to provide a better foundation for navigating differences in modes of reasoning, or between the religious and the secular. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Universities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a History | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Identity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Habermas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Sphere | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sikhs | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971 |g 54(2024), 2, Seite 297–319 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)268128154 |w (DE-600)1471703-7 |w (DE-576)104344660 |x 1096-1151 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:297–319 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2023.2289404 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4509479123 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1885439598 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240410055504 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240410||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-04-09#D4AF61746BB4A8E9D8EEBDB13A76EDF91AF4F4D1 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||