Anchor bias, autonomy, and 20th-century bioethicists' blindness to racism

The central thesis of this article is that by anchoring bioethics' core conceptual armamentarium in a four-principled theory emphasizing autonomy and treating justice as a principle of allocation, theorists inadvertently biased 20th-century bioethical scholarship against addressing such subject...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baker, Robert (Author)
Contributors: Pendyal, Akshay (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2024
In: Bioethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 275-281
RelBib Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
TK Recent history
Further subjects:B anchor bias
B Belmont Report
B cognitive bias
B Principles of Biomedical Ethics
B Autonomy
B Racism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1886025061
003 DE-627
005 20240702150045.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240417s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13258  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1886025061 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1886025061 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Baker, Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Anchor bias, autonomy, and 20th-century bioethicists' blindness to racism 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The central thesis of this article is that by anchoring bioethics' core conceptual armamentarium in a four-principled theory emphasizing autonomy and treating justice as a principle of allocation, theorists inadvertently biased 20th-century bioethical scholarship against addressing such subjects as ableism, anti-Black racism, classism, and other forms of discrimination, placing them outside of the scope of bioethics research and scholarship. It is also claimed that these scope limitations can be traced to the displacement of the nascent concept of respect for persons—a concept designed to address classist and racist discrimination—with the morally solipsistic concept of autonomy. 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a Racism 
650 4 |a Principles of Biomedical Ethics 
650 4 |a cognitive bias 
650 4 |a Belmont Report 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a anchor bias 
652 |a NBE:NCH:NCJ:TK 
700 1 |a Pendyal, Akshay  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 38(2024), 4, Seite 275-281  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g pages:275-281 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Pendyal, Akshay  |t Rawls, race, and the 20th-century bioethics  |d 2024  |w (DE-627)1890856045 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13258  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13258  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4512811915 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1886025061 
LOK |0 005 20240618141827 
LOK |0 008 240417||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-04-16#09C7CC138F25D2533C970F592AEFD199AB9990C7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL