Euthanasia, consensual homicide, and refusal of treatment
Consensual homicide remains a crime in jurisdictions where active voluntary euthanasia has been legalized. At the same time, both jurisdictions, in which euthanasia is legal and those in which it is not, recognize that all patients (whether severely ill or not) have the right to refuse or withdraw m...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2024
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 292-299 |
RelBib Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCH Medical ethics XA Law |
Further subjects: | B
consensual homicide
B refusal of medical treatment B Euthanasia |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 188602507X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240612104043.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240417s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.13261 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)188602507X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP188602507X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rivera-López, Eduardo |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Rivera-López, Eduardo |a López, Eduardo Rivera- |a Rivera López, Eduardo | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Euthanasia, consensual homicide, and refusal of treatment |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Consensual homicide remains a crime in jurisdictions where active voluntary euthanasia has been legalized. At the same time, both jurisdictions, in which euthanasia is legal and those in which it is not, recognize that all patients (whether severely ill or not) have the right to refuse or withdraw medical treatment (including life-saving treatment). In this paper, I focus on the tensions between these three norms (the permission of active euthanasia, the permission to reject life-saving treatment, and the prohibition of consensual homicide), assuming a justification of euthanasia based on the right to (personal) autonomy. I argue that the best way to provide a coherent account of these norms is to claim that patients have two distinct rights: the right to autonomy and the right to bodily integrity. This solution has some relevant implications for the discussion of the legalization of active euthanasia. | ||
650 | 4 | |a refusal of medical treatment | |
650 | 4 | |a Euthanasia | |
650 | 4 | |a consensual homicide | |
652 | |a NBE:NCH:XA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 38(2024), 4, Seite 292-299 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g pages:292-299 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13261 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13261 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a NOMM | ||
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4512811923 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 188602507X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240612104043 | ||
LOK | |0 008 240417||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-04-16#698579EAA0117010211F3CB48CA764F78C8A001E | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |