Evidence-Based Analysis of English Texts Written on Jesus’ Resurrection

Since 2004, Gary Habermas has referenced his resurrection bibliography. Frequently, Habermas and Christian apologists assert that the scholarly consensus is that writers support the resurrection: a solid majority (about 75%) of scholars who have published books or articles on Jesus’ resurrection acc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alter, Michael J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wipf and Stock Publishers 2022
In: Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry
Year: 2022, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-119
Further subjects:B Resurrection
B Historical Jesus
B Minimal Facts
B Apologetics
B Gary R. Habermas
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1887097503
003 DE-627
005 20240425162305.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240425s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1887097503 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1887097503 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Alter, Michael J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evidence-Based Analysis of English Texts Written on Jesus’ Resurrection 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Since 2004, Gary Habermas has referenced his resurrection bibliography. Frequently, Habermas and Christian apologists assert that the scholarly consensus is that writers support the resurrection: a solid majority (about 75%) of scholars who have published books or articles on Jesus’ resurrection accept the historicity of the empty tomb. However, Habermas has not presented supporting evidence for the past twenty years. This article collects and presents factual data and information about the authors of nonjuvenile, English-language texts, at least forty-eight pages written during the past 500 years on Jesus’ resurrection. Significant categories of data investigated include (1) degree(s) earned and level of education, (2) occupation and interests, and (3) religion or denomination. Approximately 775 books (including six double-counted debates) were surveyed, with 713 pros and 62 contras. Pro authors were 610 and forty-six contras. The data substantiates and expands the earlier report by Alter and Slade. This article provides evidence that a remarkably high proportion of the English-language books written about Jesus’ resurrection were by members of the clergy or people linked to seminaries and those having a professional and personal interest in the subject matter 
601 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Gary R. Habermas 
650 4 |a Minimal Facts 
650 4 |a Historical Jesus 
650 4 |a Apologetics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry  |d Eugene, OR : Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2019  |g 4(2022), 2, Seite 1-119  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1699151458  |w (DE-600)3024742-1  |x 2637-7500  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:1-119 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2023.vol4.no2.01  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.shermjournal.org/articles/evidence-based-analysis-of-english-texts-written-on-jesus%E2%80%99-resurrection  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4516244144 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1887097503 
LOK |0 005 20240425162002 
LOK |0 008 240425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL