Islamic Insights on Religious Disagreement: A New Proposal
In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed within the Islamic tradition. Specifically, I consider two religious epistemological trends within the tradition: Islamic Rationalism and Islamic Traditionalism. In examining the approaches of both trends...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
2024
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 5 |
Further subjects: | B
Islamic philosophy of religion
B epistemology of disagreement B theistic evidentialism B Reformed Epistemology B religious disagreement |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1887630767 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240504002306.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240503s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel15050574 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1887630767 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1887630767 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1272016870 |0 (DE-627)1820783790 |4 aut |a Turner, Jamie B. | |
109 | |a Turner, Jamie B. |a Turner, Jamie | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Islamic Insights on Religious Disagreement: A New Proposal |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed within the Islamic tradition. Specifically, I consider two religious epistemological trends within the tradition: Islamic Rationalism and Islamic Traditionalism. In examining the approaches of both trends toward addressing the epistemic problem, I suggest that neither is wholly adequate. Nonetheless, I argue that both approaches offer insights that might be relevant to building a more adequate response. So, I attempt to combine insights from both by drawing a distinction between inferential and noninferential reflective responsibility. Given this distinction, I argue that it may be possible for a theist to remain steadfast in upholding their tradition-specific theistic belief, without having to hold that belief by way of inference; but nevertheless, having to be sufficiently reflectively responsible in forming their theistic belief noninferentially. | ||
650 | 4 | |a theistic evidentialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Reformed Epistemology | |
650 | 4 | |a religious disagreement | |
650 | 4 | |a epistemology of disagreement | |
650 | 4 | |a Islamic philosophy of religion | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 15(2024), 5, Artikel-ID 574 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g elocationid:574 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/574/pdf?version=1714556900 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050574 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/574 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a NOMM | ||
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4519999073 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1887630767 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240503055508 | ||
LOK | |0 008 240503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-02#57327FB6D63FDC30AC4EE1D1DE3D7045D8FE0A7C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |