Islamic Insights on Religious Disagreement: A New Proposal

In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed within the Islamic tradition. Specifically, I consider two religious epistemological trends within the tradition: Islamic Rationalism and Islamic Traditionalism. In examining the approaches of both trends...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Turner, Jamie B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2024
In: Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 5
Further subjects:B Islamic philosophy of religion
B epistemology of disagreement
B theistic evidentialism
B Reformed Epistemology
B religious disagreement
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1887630767
003 DE-627
005 20240504002306.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240503s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel15050574  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1887630767 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1887630767 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1272016870  |0 (DE-627)1820783790  |4 aut  |a Turner, Jamie B. 
109 |a Turner, Jamie B.  |a Turner, Jamie 
245 1 0 |a Islamic Insights on Religious Disagreement: A New Proposal 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I consider how the epistemic problem of religious disagreement has been viewed within the Islamic tradition. Specifically, I consider two religious epistemological trends within the tradition: Islamic Rationalism and Islamic Traditionalism. In examining the approaches of both trends toward addressing the epistemic problem, I suggest that neither is wholly adequate. Nonetheless, I argue that both approaches offer insights that might be relevant to building a more adequate response. So, I attempt to combine insights from both by drawing a distinction between inferential and noninferential reflective responsibility. Given this distinction, I argue that it may be possible for a theist to remain steadfast in upholding their tradition-specific theistic belief, without having to hold that belief by way of inference; but nevertheless, having to be sufficiently reflectively responsible in forming their theistic belief noninferentially. 
650 4 |a theistic evidentialism 
650 4 |a Reformed Epistemology 
650 4 |a religious disagreement 
650 4 |a epistemology of disagreement 
650 4 |a Islamic philosophy of religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 15(2024), 5, Artikel-ID 574  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2024  |g number:5  |g elocationid:574 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/574/pdf?version=1714556900  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050574  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/574  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4519999073 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1887630767 
LOK |0 005 20240503055508 
LOK |0 008 240503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-02#57327FB6D63FDC30AC4EE1D1DE3D7045D8FE0A7C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL