When You Can’t Afford to Miss: Likelihood of Success and Discrimination in Cyberwarfare
Offense dominance in cyberspace is taken by many as a given. However, this is not a consensus position, with several scholars arguing that cyberattacks that produce meaningful kinetic effects on their prescribed targets are enormously costly and painstakingly slow. This poses an issue at the nexus o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2024
|
In: |
The review of faith & international affairs
Year: 2024, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 61–72 |
Further subjects: | B
likelihood of success
B internet security B cyberwar B Just War |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Offense dominance in cyberspace is taken by many as a given. However, this is not a consensus position, with several scholars arguing that cyberattacks that produce meaningful kinetic effects on their prescribed targets are enormously costly and painstakingly slow. This poses an issue at the nexus of Just War Theory’s likelihood of success and discrimination doctrines. Initiating (or escalating) a conflict should only occur if the initiator has a reasonable likelihood of success. That success may be made more likely by overlooking the requirement that weapons be able to discriminate between targets and non-targets, especially under circumstances in which time is of the essence. Furthermore, even if non-target systems are not destroyed, their infection can facilitate the discovery of a cyberweapon, inspiring copycat weapons and attacks. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1931-7743 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The review of faith & international affairs
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2024.2335070 |