The doing/allowing distinction in the divine context
The theist needs a conception of the distinction between doing and allowing because much of the literature focused on the problem of evil attempts to justify (via theodicy) or defend (via defence) God's allowing evil to occur. I present a counterfactual account of the doing/allowing distinction...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2024
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 60, Issue: 2, Pages: 302-312 |
| Further subjects: | B
Counterfactuals
B divine intentions B problem of evil B doing / allowing |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1890832790 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240606150808.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240606s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412523000550 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1890832790 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1890832790 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1331885302 |0 (DE-627)1890832758 |4 aut |a Kulesa, Ryan |d ca. 20./21. Jh. | |
| 109 | |a Kulesa, Ryan ca. 20./21. Jh. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The doing/allowing distinction in the divine context |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The theist needs a conception of the distinction between doing and allowing because much of the literature focused on the problem of evil attempts to justify (via theodicy) or defend (via defence) God's allowing evil to occur. I present a counterfactual account of the doing/allowing distinction in the divine context and argue that, even if there are compelling objections to counterfactual accounts of the distinction in the human context, they do not work against such an account in the divine context. The counterfactual analysis to follow will allow the theist to plausibly claim that God does not ever bring about evil, which is crucial to some defences against the problem of evil. I conclude by defending my account against possible objections. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Counterfactuals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a divine intentions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a doing/allowing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 60(2024), 2, Seite 302-312 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:302-312 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000550 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/doingallowing-distinction-in-the-divine-context/B934E974E1A6E078A0E370F2217E4683 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4535061750 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1890832790 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240606150808 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240606||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||