Interpreting Humani Generis: The Evolution Controversy in the Melbourne Catholic Press, 1960–61
From mid-1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper The Advocate carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra-denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2024
|
| In: |
Journal of religious history
Year: 2024, Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 201-214 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1891098926 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240612055505.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240612s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-9809.13060 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1891098926 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1891098926 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Barnes, Joel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interpreting Humani Generis: The Evolution Controversy in the Melbourne Catholic Press, 1960–61 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a From mid-1960 to early 1961, the Melbourne Catholic weekly newspaper The Advocate carried an extended controversy on evolutionary science and its compatibility with the teachings of the Church. An intra-denominational debate among Catholic scientists, clergy and laymen, the controversy was shaped by the theological framework of Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis (1950), which included the first ever papal statement on evolution. As a grassroots debate in which official Catholic policy as outlined in the encyclical was open to interpretation by competing interests, the controversy serves as an index of the ambiguities of Humani Generis, and of the uncertainties of wider Church policy at the time, regarding evolutionary science and human evolution in particular. The article considers the Advocate controversy and its immediate aftermath within the context of Humani Generis's strictures on human evolution, and within the longer history of Catholic responses to and engagement with evolutionary science. | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 601 | |a Melbourne | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious history |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 48(2024), 2, Seite 201-214 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593295 |w (DE-600)1482875-3 |w (DE-576)095551751 |x 1467-9809 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:201-214 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1467-9809.13060 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9809.13060 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9809.13060 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4536645373 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1891098926 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240612055505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240612||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-06-11#883521F7C6802A4AEE3F2FA27C869BD61818E554 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||