Chains of persuasion in the deliberative system: addressing the pragmatics of religious inclusion
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Chicago Press
2015
|
| In: |
The journal of politics
Year: 2015, Volume: 77, Issue: 4, Pages: 889-900 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1892086530 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240624123038.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240624s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1086/678352 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1892086530 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1892086530 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1177949490 |0 (DE-627)104906688X |0 (DE-576)517627426 |4 aut |a Hertzberg, Benjamin R. | |
| 109 | |a Hertzberg, Benjamin R. |a Hertzberg, Benjamin | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chains of persuasion in the deliberative system |b addressing the pragmatics of religious inclusion |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 290 | |a If one accepts that religious arguments ought to be included in democratic deliberations, three problems immediately arise. First, religious arguments will not persuade those who do not accept the religious premises, so religious arguments do not seem to contribute to deliberative opinion and will formation. Second, democratic arguments will not persuade religious citizens who prioritize their religious commitments (“integralists”), who seem to be excluded from deliberative opinion and will formation. Third, if an integralist makes a religious argument intending to persuade, then she seems to be appealing to an invidious double standard: she expects her fellows to be potentially persuaded by her religious argument when she is not reciprocally open to persuasion on the basis of their comprehensive views. I argue that approaching deliberation from a deliberative systems view provides a powerful approach to each of these three problems unavailable to more traditional understandings of deliberative democracy. | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 601 | |a Pragmatik | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of politics |d Chicago, Ill. : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1939 |g 77(2015), 4, Seite 889-900 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)312086636 |w (DE-600)2001886-1 |w (DE-576)094142084 |x 1468-2508 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:889-900 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1086/678352 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4541388804 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1892086530 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240624123038 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240624||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||