Feeding Infants: Choice-Specific Considerations, Parental Obligation, and Pragmatic Satisficing

Health institutions recommend that young infants be exclusively breastfed on demand, and it is widely held that parents who can breastfeed have an obligation to do so. This has been challenged in recent philosophical work, especially by Fiona Woollard. Woollard's work critically engages with tw...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Moriarty, Clare Marie (Author) ; Davies, Ben (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2024, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 167-183
RelBib Classification:NCB Personal ethics
NCH Medical ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Formula feeding
B Parental obligation
B Satisficing
B Breastfeeding
B Public health
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1892102854
003 DE-627
005 20250327143008.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240624s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-023-10400-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1892102854 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1892102854 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Moriarty, Clare Marie  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0830-3746  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Feeding Infants  |b Choice-Specific Considerations, Parental Obligation, and Pragmatic Satisficing 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Health institutions recommend that young infants be exclusively breastfed on demand, and it is widely held that parents who can breastfeed have an obligation to do so. This has been challenged in recent philosophical work, especially by Fiona Woollard. Woollard's work critically engages with two distinct views of parental obligation that might ground such an obligation - based on maximal benefit and avoidance of significant harm - to reject an obligation to breastfeed. While agreeing with Woollard's substantive conclusion, this paper (drawing on philosophical discussion of the "right to rear") argues that there are several more moderate views of parental obligation which might also be thought to ground parental obligation. We first show that an obligation to breastfeed might result not from a general obligation to maximally benefit one's child, but from what we call "choice-specific" obligations to maximise benefit within particular activities. We then develop this idea through two views of parental obligation - the Dual Interest view, and the Best Custodian view - to ground an obligation to exclusively breastfeed on demand, before showing how both these more moderate views fail. Finally, we argue that not only is there no general obligation to breastfeed children, but that it is often morally right not to do so. Since much advice from health institutions on this issue implies that exclusive breastfeeding on demand is the best option for all families, our argument drives the feeding debate forward by showing that this advice often misrepresents parents’ moral obligations in potentially harmful ways. 
601 |a Pragmatik 
650 4 |a Breastfeeding 
650 4 |a Formula feeding 
650 4 |a Parental obligation 
650 4 |a Public Health 
650 4 |a Satisficing 
652 |a NCB:NCH:VA 
700 1 |a Davies, Ben  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4612-7894  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 27(2024), 2, Seite 167-183  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2024  |g number:2  |g pages:167-183 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-023-10400-5.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10400-5  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4541422573 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1892102854 
LOK |0 005 20250327143008 
LOK |0 008 240624||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052813  |a NCB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 939   |a 24-06-24  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Public health 
STB 0 0 |a Santé publique 
STC 0 0 |a Salud pública 
STD 0 0 |a Sanità pubblica 
STF 0 0 |a 公共卫生 
STG 0 0 |a Saúde pública 
STH 0 0 |a Народное здравоохранение 
STI 0 0 |a Δημόσια υγεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Öffentliche Gesundheit,Bevölkerungsgesundheit,Volksgesundheit,Volkshygiene