James Baldwin as a Preface to Christian Ethics

Christian ethics stands to benefit from its critics. I argue that James Baldwin should be placed among Ludwig Feuerbach, David Hume, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Nietzsche as a salutary preface to Christian ethics, especially in his reflections on race and sexuality. Together these figures underscore so...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yin, Peng (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2024
In: Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 44, Issue: 1, Pages: 155-172
RelBib Classification:FA Theology
NBE Anthropology
NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1895102154
003 DE-627
005 20240724145232.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240711s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/jsce2024319102  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1895102154 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1895102154 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Yin, Peng  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Yin, Peng  |a Peng, Yin  |a Peng Yin 
245 1 0 |a James Baldwin as a Preface to Christian Ethics 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Christian ethics stands to benefit from its critics. I argue that James Baldwin should be placed among Ludwig Feuerbach, David Hume, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Nietzsche as a salutary preface to Christian ethics, especially in his reflections on race and sexuality. Together these figures underscore some characteristic damages of some Christian beliefs. I show Baldwin’s astute treatment of Christianity in four distinctive voices and suggest the recovery of genres, the appreciation for recent achievements and unfinished tasks in the field, the vigilance about ambivalent ethical implications inherent in Christian doctrine (such as eudaimonism and providentialism), and the unsentimental affective preparation as pedagogical gains of including Baldwin in Christian ethics syllabi. 
652 |a FA:NBE:NCA:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Society of Christian Ethics  |t Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics  |d Charlottesville, Virgina : Philosophy Documentation Center, 2002  |g 44(2024), 1, Seite 155-172  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618796118  |w (DE-600)2538854-X  |w (DE-576)325341176  |x 2326-2176  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:155-172 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/jsce2024319102  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=jsce&id=jsce_2024_0044_0001_0155_0172  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4549179139 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1895102154 
LOK |0 005 20240724145232 
LOK |0 008 240711||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-07-10#83661EDD6894861B5F58CFC166276E220F4B55AF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044020  |a FA 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL