Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus, Megarian Philosophers
Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus have received little attention from scholars. Sources on these philosophers are few and difficult to interpret. However, they present interesting dialectical arguments that concern some of Plato’s and Aristotle’s most important theoretical elaborations: Bryson’s argu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2024
|
| In: |
Phronesis
Year: 2024, Volume: 69, Issue: 3, Pages: 251-278 |
| Further subjects: | B
Bryson of Heraclea
B Megarians B Polyxenus B Plato B Dialectic B Aristotle |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1895166454 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240826222446.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240712s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15685284-bja10092 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1895166454 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1895166454 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chame, Santiago |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8163-8342 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus, Megarian Philosophers |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus have received little attention from scholars. Sources on these philosophers are few and difficult to interpret. However, they present interesting dialectical arguments that concern some of Plato’s and Aristotle’s most important theoretical elaborations: Bryson’s arguments on the issue of semantic ambiguity were explicitly discussed by Aristotle, and Polyxenus is credited with a particular version of the Third Man argument. My purpose in this paper is to reconstruct the historical background of these two philosophers and to analyze the philosophical implications of the arguments that the ancient tradition ascribes to them. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aristotle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Plato | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dialectic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Megarians | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Polyxenus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bryson of Heraclea | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Phronesis |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1955 |g 69(2024), 3, Seite 251-278 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)325566992 |w (DE-600)2036943-8 |w (DE-576)09411398X |x 1568-5284 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g pages:251-278 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10092 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/phro/69/3/article-p251_1.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4549859431 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1895166454 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240712055507 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240712||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-07-11#D442A51A851A4C49589F7BF25E7885C1C487A13E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Platon |