Who Is the Father of Existentialism? The Historical Context of Kierkegaard’s Criticism of Hegel’s Interpretation of Actuality
In the 1830s and 1840s, there was a decisive conflict between the Danish followers of Hegel and his opponents. The latter criticized Hegel’s philosophy for being overly abstract and having lost touch with reality. Kierkegaard is given credit for this criticism and for establishing a new philosophica...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2024
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2024, Volume: 29, Issue: 1, Pages: 211-227 |
| RelBib Classification: | KBE Northern Europe; Scandinavia TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1895974119 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240814100328.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240722s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/kierke-2024-0011 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1895974119 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1895974119 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)121152839 |0 (DE-627)081120249 |0 (DE-576)292560583 |4 aut |a Stewart, Jon |d 1961- | |
| 109 | |a Stewart, Jon 1961- |a Stewart, Jon Bartley 1961- |a Stewart, Jon B. 1961- |a Bartley Stewart, Jon 1961- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who Is the Father of Existentialism? The Historical Context of Kierkegaard’s Criticism of Hegel’s Interpretation of Actuality |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the 1830s and 1840s, there was a decisive conflict between the Danish followers of Hegel and his opponents. The latter criticized Hegel’s philosophy for being overly abstract and having lost touch with reality. Kierkegaard is given credit for this criticism and for establishing a new philosophical direction that rejects abstraction and focuses on the concrete experience of the individual. The present article argues that there was nothing particularly new about Kierkegaard’s rejection of abstract philosophy and his attempt to emphasize actuality and life. In fact, the conflict was wider and extended to many other Danish thinkers at the time who were critical of precisely this point in Hegel. | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 652 | |a KBE:TJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996 |g 29(2024), 1, Seite 211-227 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)369083393 |w (DE-600)2118444-6 |w (DE-576)107015773 |x 1612-9792 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:211-227 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2024-0011 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2024-0011/html |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4555108930 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1895974119 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240918134950 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240722||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044780 |a KBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||