Waarom verdween de academische godsdienstwijsbegeerte uit Nederland?
Why has Academic Philosophy of Religion Disappeared in The Netherlands? The question why academic philosophy of religion disappeared in the Netherlands has been raised by Arie L. Molendijk, Marcel Sarot and Albert F. de Jong. Central to their arguments is the way philosophers of religion positioned...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Amsterdam University Press
2024
|
| In: |
NTT
Year: 2024, Volume: 78, Issue: 2, Pages: 111-118 |
| Further subjects: | B
Individualization
B Secularization B strong religion B Philosophy of religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1899595880 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240827114149.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240827s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5117/NTT2024.2.005.DREE |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1899595880 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1899595880 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)120607484 |0 (DE-627)08077816X |0 (DE-576)165917652 |4 aut |a Drees, Willem B. |d 1954- | |
| 109 | |a Drees, Willem B. 1954- |a Drees, Willem Bernard 1954- |a Drees, Willem 1954- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Waarom verdween de academische godsdienstwijsbegeerte uit Nederland? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Why has Academic Philosophy of Religion Disappeared in The Netherlands? The question why academic philosophy of religion disappeared in the Netherlands has been raised by Arie L. Molendijk, Marcel Sarot and Albert F. de Jong. Central to their arguments is the way philosophers of religion positioned themselves. Contrary to this ‘internal’ emphasis, I will argue that the disappearance of philosophy of religion is a consequence of developments in society. As society changed, the choices of potential students changed, and university administrators followed. That has not much to do with the specific way in which academic philosophers of religion understood their own discipline. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Individualization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secularization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a strong religion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t NTT |d Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press, 2017 |g 78(2024), 2, Seite 111-118 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1028846045 |w (DE-600)2938804-1 |w (DE-576)508474957 |x 2590-3268 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:111-118 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5117/NTT2024.2.005.DREE |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2024.2.005.DREE |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4571032765 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1899595880 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240827110828 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240827||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||