Bias Defended

In this paper, I clarify and defend some of the central ideas of Bias in response to commentators, with a special focus on the theme of skepticism. In response to Michael Veber, I defend the project of offering a modest as opposed to an ambitious response to the skeptic. In response to Jonathan Math...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2024, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Pages: 234-258
Further subjects:B biased knowing
B bias attributions
B emergent bias
B epistemology of disagreement
B suspension of judgment
B Skepticism
B Knowledge
B Test bias
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1903339685
003 DE-627
005 20250109085844.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240924s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10089  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1903339685 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1903339685 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1276385218  |0 (DE-627)1829248685  |4 aut  |a Kelly, Thomas 
109 |a Kelly, Thomas  |a Philanderas 
245 1 0 |a Bias Defended 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, I clarify and defend some of the central ideas of Bias in response to commentators, with a special focus on the theme of skepticism. In response to Michael Veber, I defend the project of offering a modest as opposed to an ambitious response to the skeptic. In response to Jonathan Matheson, I defend my account of the way in which bias attributions function in contexts of interpersonal disagreement, as well as the claim that an unbiased believer will generally be in a stronger position to resist skeptical pressure from disagreement than a biased believer. In response to Brett Sherman, I clarify the way in which my account of bias accommodates the phenomenon of biased suspension of judgment, and I explore some of the connections between bias, suspension of judgment, and skepticism. In response to Jared Celinker and Nathan Ballantyne, I defend the possibility of emergent biases. 
650 4 |a biased knowing 
650 4 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a epistemology of disagreement 
650 4 |a bias attributions 
650 4 |a emergent bias 
650 4 |a suspension of judgment 
650 4 |a Skepticism 
650 4 |a Bias 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 14(2024), 3, Seite 234-258  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:234-258 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10089  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/14/3/article-p234_006.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4582730841 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1903339685 
LOK |0 005 20241219142513 
LOK |0 008 240924||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-09-23#ABF2AF639F24354D3AE0C9AFE3559C6A92FE7081 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 24-09-24  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Test bias 
STB 0 0 |a Biais (distorsion) 
STC 0 0 |a Sesgo 
STG 0 0 |a Viés 
STH 0 0 |a Предвзятость 
STI 0 0 |a Μεροληψία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Knowledge and scientific news , Verzerrung