The Ambiguous Religiosity of Justin Martyr: Historical, Theological, and Anthropological Conceptions for a Christian in a Plural Context

The comparison that Justin Martyr makes between the Christianity to which he converted and the traditional cults of his time has two sides that make Justin’s religiosity essentially ambiguous. On the one hand, Justin critically attributes the concepts and practices of ancient religiosity to the infl...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Banna, Pierluigi 1984- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2024
Dans: Scrinium
Année: 2024, Volume: 20, Numéro: 1, Pages: 3-21
RelBib Classification:BE Religion gréco-romaine
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
KAB Christianisme primitif
NAB Théologie fondamentale
NBF Christologie
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B superstitio
B Religious Pluralism
B theology of the Logos
B Apologetics
B religio vera
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The comparison that Justin Martyr makes between the Christianity to which he converted and the traditional cults of his time has two sides that make Justin’s religiosity essentially ambiguous. On the one hand, Justin critically attributes the concepts and practices of ancient religiosity to the influence of demons. On the other hand, he wants to justify the universality of the Logos in human history. For this reason, he recognizes, in an appreciative way, certain traces of truth and morality in Greek wisdom, which finds its fullness and fulfillment in Christ, Logos made flesh. In the light of this ambiguous religiosity, one can understand why Justin coins the phrase “Christians before Jesus” as a category for Socrates and others. The driving force behind this operation is certainly confessional and proselytising, but for contemporary dialogue it can stimulate a sincere and passionate exchange with the religious position of one’s interlocutors.
ISSN:1817-7565
Contient:Enthalten in: Scrinium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18177565-bja10107