God, Über-God, and Unter-God
I examine two related arguments for the claim that if God is omnipotent, God cannot lack abilities such as the ability to do evil or to act irrationally. Both arguments concern the idea that omnipotence is inconsistent with being dominated with respect to abilities. I raise new issues in the formula...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2024, Volume: 60, Numéro: 4, Pages: 564-579 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
abilities
B Theism B Omnipotence B dominance principles |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1915457440 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250123112001.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250123s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S003441252300063X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1915457440 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1915457440 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gordon, Noah |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-0853-4272 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a God, Über-God, and Unter-God |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I examine two related arguments for the claim that if God is omnipotent, God cannot lack abilities such as the ability to do evil or to act irrationally. Both arguments concern the idea that omnipotence is inconsistent with being dominated with respect to abilities. I raise new issues in the formulation of such dominance principles about ability, and attempt to solve them. I also discuss and reject existing objections to these arguments. I conclude that these arguments are promising but not conclusive, and that important work remains to be done in formulating the relevant dominance principles. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a abilities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dominance principles | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Omnipotence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 60(2024), 4, Seite 564-579 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g pages:564-579 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441252300063X |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/god-ubergod-and-untergod/9AD4212CD64B76BDDCCCB5BE9C866D73 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4655284919 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1915457440 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250522101655 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
